IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1684-d1038664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Isselhard

    (Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

  • Zoe Lautz

    (Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

  • Maren Töpper

    (Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

  • Kerstin Rhiem

    (Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

  • Rita Schmutzler

    (Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

  • Frank Vitinius

    (Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

  • Hannah Fischer

    (Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

  • Birte Berger-Höger

    (Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
    Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany)

  • Anke Steckelberg

    (Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany)

  • Karolina Beifus

    (Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Juliane Köberlein-Neu

    (Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Stephanie Stock

    (Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

Women who are found to carry a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant experience psychological distress due to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They may decide between different preventive options. In this secondary analysis of data collected alongside a larger randomized controlled trial, we are looking at 130 newly found BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and how their coping self-efficacy immediately after genetic test result disclosure is related to their psychological burden and status of preventive decision making. Participants received the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Impact of Event Scale, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Stage of Decision-Making Scale after positive genetic test result disclosure. We found that women with higher coping self-efficacy showed fewer symptoms of anxiety or depression and were less affected by receiving the genetic test result in terms of post-traumatic stress. However, coping self-efficacy had no relationship with any decision-related criteria, such as decisional conflict or stage of decision making. This shows that despite its buffering capacity on psychological burden, possessing coping self-efficacy does not lead to more decisiveness in preference-sensitive decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Isselhard & Zoe Lautz & Maren Töpper & Kerstin Rhiem & Rita Schmutzler & Frank Vitinius & Hannah Fischer & Birte Berger-Höger & Anke Steckelberg & Karolina Beifus & Juliane Köberlein-Neu & Stepha, 2023. "Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1684-:d:1038664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1684-:d:1038664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.