IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p991-d1026170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

#SexyBodyPositive: When Sexualization Does Not Undermine Young Women’s Body Image

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Di Michele

    (Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Francesca Guizzo

    (School of Psychology, Stag Hill Campus, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7HX, UK)

  • Natale Canale

    (Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Fabio Fasoli

    (School of Psychology, Stag Hill Campus, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7HX, UK)

  • Francesca Carotta

    (Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Arianna Pollini

    (Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Mara Cadinu

    (Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

Research suggests that exposure to social networking sites portraying a thin and often sexualized beauty ideal reduces young women’s body satisfaction, while exposure to body-positive content improves it. However, it is unclear whether sexualization could impair the beneficial effects of body-positivity messages. Young Italian women were exposed to one of three experimental conditions showing sexualized beauty ideals, sexualized body positivity, or non-sexualized body positivity that appeared either on Instagram (Study 1, N = 356) or TikTok (Study 2, N = 316). Across the two studies, results showed that, regardless of sexualization, exposure to body positivity increased body satisfaction and positive mood compared with pre-exposure measures, while exposure to sexualized beauty ideals reduced it. Participants in the sexualized beauty ideal condition also engaged in upward appearance social comparison whereas body positivity elicited downward comparison. Problematic social networking sites’ use moderated the effects of condition on body satisfaction, appearance social comparison, and positive mood, while downward comparison mediated the relation between condition and body satisfaction and positive mood. Our results highlight both beneficial and critical aspects of body positivity that should be taken into consideration when designing body image interventions and policymaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Di Michele & Francesca Guizzo & Natale Canale & Fabio Fasoli & Francesca Carotta & Arianna Pollini & Mara Cadinu, 2023. "#SexyBodyPositive: When Sexualization Does Not Undermine Young Women’s Body Image," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:991-:d:1026170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/991/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/991/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharon Lamb & Julie Koven, 2019. "Sexualization of Girls: Addressing Criticism of the APA Report, Presenting New Evidence," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabrizio Santoniccolo & Tommaso Trombetta & Maria Noemi Paradiso & Luca Rollè, 2023. "Gender and Media Representations: A Review of the Literature on Gender Stereotypes, Objectification and Sexualization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sinha, Chetan, 2021. "Dehumanized gender identity: Critical reflection on neuroscience, power relationship and law," OSF Preprints sza6y, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:991-:d:1026170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.