IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1654-d1037991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of a Six-Year Existing Screening Programme Using the Faecal Immunochemical Test in Flanders (Belgium) on Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Survival: A Population-Based Study

Author

Listed:
  • Thuy Ngan Tran

    (Centre for Cancer Detection, 8000 Bruges, Belgium
    Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Sarah Hoeck

    (Centre for Cancer Detection, 8000 Bruges, Belgium
    Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Harlinde De Schutter

    (Research Department, Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Sharon Janssens

    (Research Department, Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Marc Peeters

    (Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
    Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Guido Van Hal

    (Centre for Cancer Detection, 8000 Bruges, Belgium
    Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been increasingly used for organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assessed the impact of a six-year existing FIT screening programme in Flanders (Belgium) on CRC incidence, mortality and survival. The Flemish CRC screening programme started in 2013, targeting individuals aged 50–74 years. Joinpoint regression was used to investigate trends of age-standardised CRC incidence and mortality among individuals aged 50–79 years (2004–2019). Their 5-year relative survival was calculated using the Ederer II method. We found that FIT screening significantly reduced CRC incidence, especially that of advanced-stage CRCs (69.8/100,000 in 2012 vs. 51.1/100,000 in 2019), with a greater impact in men. Mortality started to decline in men two years after organised screening implementation (annual reduction of 9.3% after 2015 vs. 2.2% before 2015). The 5-year relative survival was significantly higher in screen-detected (93.8%) and lower in FIT non-participant CRCs (61.9%) vs. FIT interval cancers and CRCs in never-invited cases (67.6% and 66.7%, respectively). Organised FIT screening in Flanders clearly reduced CRC incidence (especially advanced-stage) and mortality (in men, but not yet in women). Survival is significantly better in screen-detected cases vs. CRCs in unscreened people. Our findings support the implementation of FIT organised screening and the continued effort to increase uptake.

Suggested Citation

  • Thuy Ngan Tran & Sarah Hoeck & Harlinde De Schutter & Sharon Janssens & Marc Peeters & Guido Van Hal, 2023. "The Impact of a Six-Year Existing Screening Programme Using the Faecal Immunochemical Test in Flanders (Belgium) on Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Survival: A Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1654-:d:1037991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1654-:d:1037991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.