IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1507-d1035360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Musculoskeletal-Modeling-Based, Full-Body Load-Assessment Tool for Ergonomists (MATE): Method Development and Proof of Concept Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur van der Have

    (Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium)

  • Sam Van Rossom

    (Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium)

  • Ilse Jonkers

    (Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium)

Abstract

A new ergonomic-risk-assessment tool was developed that combines musculoskeletal-model-based loading estimates with insights from fatigue failure theory to evaluate full-body musculoskeletal loading during dynamic tasks. Musculoskeletal-modeling output parameters, i.e., joint contact forces and muscle forces, were combined with tissue-specific injury thresholds that account for loading frequency to determine the injury risk for muscles, lower back, and hip cartilage. The potential of this new risk-assessment tool is demonstrated for defining ergonomic interventions in terms of lifting characteristics, back and shoulder exoskeleton assistance, box transferring, stoop lifting, and an overhead wiring task, respectively. The MATE identifies the risk of WMSDs in different anatomical regions during occupational tasks and allows for the evaluation of the impact of interventions that modify specific lifting characteristics, i.e., load weight versus task repetition. Furthermore, and in clear contrast to currently available ergonomic assessment scores, the effects of the exoskeleton assistance level on the risk of WMSDs of full-body musculoskeletal loading (in particular, the muscles, lower back, and hips) can be evaluated and shows small reductions in musculoskeletal loading but not in injury risk. Therefore, the MATE is a risk-assessment tool based on a full-body, musculoskeletal-modeling approach combined with insights from the fatigue failure theory that shows the proof of concept of a shoulder and back exoskeleton. Furthermore, it accounts for subject-specific characteristics (age and BMI), further enhancing individualized ergonomic-risk assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur van der Have & Sam Van Rossom & Ilse Jonkers, 2023. "Musculoskeletal-Modeling-Based, Full-Body Load-Assessment Tool for Ergonomists (MATE): Method Development and Proof of Concept Case Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1507-:d:1035360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1507/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1507/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1507-:d:1035360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.