IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1477-d1034788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Characteristics of the Reduction of Interference Effect during Dual-Task Cognitive-Motor Training Compared to a Single Task Cognitive and Motor Training in Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Justyna Wiśniowska

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Emilia Łojek

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Agnieszka Olejnik

    (Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Chabuda

    (Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Many studies have indicated a weakening in several areas of cognitive functioning associated with the normal ageing process. One of the methods supporting cognitive functions in older adults is dual-task training which is based on performing cognitive and motor exercises at the same time. The study aimed at examining the characteristics of dual-task training compared to single-task training in participants over 65 years of age. Sixty-five subjects took part in the study. They were randomly assigned to three groups: dual-task cognitive-motor training (CM), single-task cognitive training (CT), and single-task motor training (MT). The training program in all groups encompassed 4 weeks and consisted of three, 30-min meetings a week. Specialized software was designed for the study. The main indicators, such as orientation and planning time and the number of errors, were monitored during the whole training in all groups. The obtained results have shown that the dual-task training was associated with a significantly greater number of movement errors, but not with a longer task planning time compared to the single-task condition training. There was a decrease in the time needed to plan a path in the mazes by subjects training in the CM, CT, and MT groups. The results indicate that after each type of training, the number of errors and the time needed to plan the path decrease, despite the increasing difficulty of the tasks. The length of planning time was strongly correlated with the number of errors made by individuals in the CM group (r = 0.74, p = 0.04), compared to the ST group—for which the said correlation was not significant (r = 0.7, p = 0.06). The dual-task cognitive-motor training is more cognitively demanding compared to the single-task cognitive and motor training. It manifests in a greater number of errors, but it does not extend the orientation and planning time.

Suggested Citation

  • Justyna Wiśniowska & Emilia Łojek & Agnieszka Olejnik & Anna Chabuda, 2023. "The Characteristics of the Reduction of Interference Effect during Dual-Task Cognitive-Motor Training Compared to a Single Task Cognitive and Motor Training in Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1477-:d:1034788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1477/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1477/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1477-:d:1034788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.