IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1287-d1031593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hospitalisation at Home of Patients with COVID-19: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Cerdan de las Heras

    (Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark)

  • Signe Lindgård Andersen

    (Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark)

  • Sophie Matthies

    (Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark
    Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark)

  • Tatjana Vektorvna Sandreva

    (Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark)

  • Caroline Klint Johannesen

    (Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark
    Department of Virology and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Thyge Lynghøj Nielsen

    (Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark)

  • Natascha Fuglebjerg

    (Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark)

  • Daniel Catalan-Matamoros

    (Department of Communication, Madrid University Carlos III, 28903 Madrid, Spain)

  • Dorte Gilså Hansen

    (Institute of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Thea K. Fischer

    (Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark
    Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Hospitalisation at Home (HaH) is a new model providing hospital-level care at home as a substitute for traditional care. Biometric monitoring and digital communication are crucial, but little is known about user perspectives. We aim to explore how in-patients with severe COVID-19 infection and clinicians engage with and experience communication and self-monitoring activities following the HaH model. A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews of patients and clinicians participating in the early development phase of HaH were conducted. We interviewed eight clinicians and six patients. Five themes emerged from clinicians: (1) staff fear and concerns, (2) workflow, (3) virtual closeness, (4) patient relatives, and (5) future HaH models; four themes emerged from patients: (1) transition to home, (2) joint responsibility, (3) acceptability of technologies, and (4) relatives. Despite technical problems, both patients and clinicians were enthusiastic about the conceptual HaH idea. If appropriately introduced, treatment based on self-monitoring and remote communication was perceived acceptable for the patients; however, obtaining vitals at night was an overwhelming challenge. HaH is generally acceptable, perceived patient-centred, influencing routine clinical workflow, role and job satisfaction. Therefore, it calls for educational programs including more perspective than issues related to technical devices.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Cerdan de las Heras & Signe Lindgård Andersen & Sophie Matthies & Tatjana Vektorvna Sandreva & Caroline Klint Johannesen & Thyge Lynghøj Nielsen & Natascha Fuglebjerg & Daniel Catalan-Matamoros &, 2023. "Hospitalisation at Home of Patients with COVID-19: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1287-:d:1031593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1287-:d:1031593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.