IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1279-d1031504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Higher Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Doses Lead to Greater Gains in Upper Limb Motor Function in Post-Stroke Patients?

Author

Listed:
  • Raylene Pires

    (Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-900, Brazil
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Adriana Baltar

    (Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-900, Brazil
    NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Recife 55540-00, Brazil
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Maria Paz Sanchez

    (Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-900, Brazil)

  • Gabriel Barreto Antonino

    (Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-900, Brazil
    NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Recife 55540-00, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Brito

    (Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-900, Brazil
    NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Recife 55540-00, Brazil)

  • Marina Berenguer-Rocha

    (Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-900, Brazil)

  • Katia Monte-Silva

    (Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-900, Brazil
    NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Recife 55540-00, Brazil)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether a higher number of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) sessions results in a greater improvement in upper limb function in chronic post-stroke patients. Materials and methods : A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 57 chronic post-stroke patients (≥ 3 months after their injuries). The patients were allocated to receive sessions of tDCS combined with physiotherapy and divided into three groups (anodal, cathodal, and sham). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) was used to assess the sensorimotor impairment of the patients’ upper limbs before (baseline) and after five and ten sessions. The percentage of patients who achieved a clinically significant improvement (> five points on the FMA-UE) was also analyzed. Results: The FMA-UE score increased after five and ten sessions in both the anodal and cathodal tDCS groups, respectively, compared to the baseline. However, in the sham group, the FMA-UE score increased only after ten sessions. When compared to the sham group, the mean difference from the baseline after five sessions was higher in the anodal tDCS group. The percentage of individuals who achieved greater clinical improvement was higher in the stimulation groups than in the sham group and after ten sessions when compared to five sessions. Conclusions: Our results suggest that five tDCS sessions are sufficient to augment the effect of standard physiotherapy on upper limb function recovery in chronic post-stroke patients, and ten sessions resulted in greater gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Raylene Pires & Adriana Baltar & Maria Paz Sanchez & Gabriel Barreto Antonino & Rodrigo Brito & Marina Berenguer-Rocha & Katia Monte-Silva, 2023. "Do Higher Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Doses Lead to Greater Gains in Upper Limb Motor Function in Post-Stroke Patients?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1279-:d:1031504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1279-:d:1031504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.