IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1265-d1031121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The FRISK (Fracture Risk)—A New Tool to Indicate the Probability of Fractures

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Wichlas

    (Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Franziska Melanie Hahn

    (Campus Virchow, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Serafeim Tsitsilonis

    (Campus Virchow, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Tobias Lindner

    (Campus Virchow, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Tim Marnitz

    (Campus Virchow, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Christian Deininger

    (Institute of Tendon and Bone Regeneration, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Valeska Hofmann

    (Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

Increasing patient inflow into the emergency department makes it necessary to optimize triage management. The scope of this work was to determine simple factors that could detect fractures in patients without the need for specialized personnel. Between 2014 and 2015, 798 patients were admitted to an orthopedic emergency department and prospectively included in the study. The patients received a questionnaire before contacting the doctor. Objective and subjective data were evaluated to determine fracture risk for the upper and lower extremities. The highest risk for fractures in one region was the hip (73.21%; n = 56), followed by the wrist (60.32%; n = 63) and the femoral shaft (4 of 7, 57.14%; n = 7). The regions with the lowest risk were the knee (8.41%; n = 107), the ankle (18.29%; n = 164), and the forearm shaft (30.00%; n = 10). Age was a predictor for fracture: patients older than 59 years had a risk greater than 59.26%, and patients older than 90 years had a risk greater than 83.33%. The functional questions could exclude fractures. Three factors seem to be able to predict fracture risk: the injured region, the patient’s age, and a functional question. They can be used for a probatory heuristic that needs to be proven in a prospective way.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Wichlas & Franziska Melanie Hahn & Serafeim Tsitsilonis & Tobias Lindner & Tim Marnitz & Christian Deininger & Valeska Hofmann, 2023. "The FRISK (Fracture Risk)—A New Tool to Indicate the Probability of Fractures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1265-:d:1031121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1265-:d:1031121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.