IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1207-d1030489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Pandemic-Related Factors Associated with Emergency Department Visits in Portugal throughout Two Years of the Pandemic: A Retrospective Population-Based Study

Author

Listed:
  • Walaa Kinaan

    (NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Patrícia Soares

    (NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • João Victor Rocha

    (NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Paulo Boto

    (NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Rui Santana

    (NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Sílvia Lopes

    (NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University Lisbon, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the use of emergency departments (ED) worldwide. This study identifies the pandemic-related factors associated with the number of ED visits in mainland Portugal and each of its regions. We collected data on ED visits from March 2020 to March 2022. Data on incidence, vaccination, mobility, containment index, and Google search volume were retrieved from open online sources at different time points. We fitted a quasi-Poisson generalized linear regression model, and each variable was modeled separately and adjusted for time and month. There was a positive ED trend throughout the two years of the pandemic in mainland Portugal and each of its regions. In the mainland, during months with high workplace mobility, there were 10.5% more ED visits compared to months with average mobility. ED visits decreased in months with low mobility for retail and recreation, groceries and pharmacies, and transit compared to months of medium mobility. Portugal saw a reduction in ED utilization during the pandemic period, but with a positive trend from March 2020 to March 2022. The change in the population’s behavior of seeking the ED throughout the pandemic might be associated with mobility, incidence, and pandemic fatigue.

Suggested Citation

  • Walaa Kinaan & Patrícia Soares & João Victor Rocha & Paulo Boto & Rui Santana & Sílvia Lopes, 2023. "The Pandemic-Related Factors Associated with Emergency Department Visits in Portugal throughout Two Years of the Pandemic: A Retrospective Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1207-:d:1030489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi-Chang Chou & Yung-Feng Yen & Dachen Chu & Hsiao-Yun Hu, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare-Seeking Behaviors among Frequent Emergency Department Users: A Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hind A. Beydoun & May A. Beydoun & Brook T. Alemu & Jordan Weiss & Sharmin Hossain & Rana S. Gautam & Alan B. Zonderman, 2022. "Determinants of COVID-19 Outcome as Predictors of Delayed Healthcare Services among Adults ≥50 Years during the Pandemic: 2006–2020 Health and Retirement Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1207-:d:1030489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.