IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1138-d1029279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Pei-Chen Li

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan)

  • Wing Lam Tsui

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan)

  • Dah-Ching Ding

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
    Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before labor induction can predict successful induction. This retrospective study recruited 138 pregnant women who underwent labor induction at 37–41 weeks of gestation. Cervical length was measured using transvaginal ultrasonography before labor induction. Labor was induced according to the hospital protocol. Age, gestational age (GA), parity, body mass index (BMI), Bishop score, hemoglobin level, maternal disease, and epidural anesthesia were also recorded. Labor induction outcomes, including cesarean section for failed induction, time of induction, and the three labor stages, were assessed. From December 2018 to December 2021, 138 women were recruited for our study, including 120 and 18 women with successful and failed labor induction, respectively. Shorter cervical length (≤3.415 cm, OR = 6.22, 95% CI = 1.75–22.15) and multiparity (OR = 17.69, 95% CI = 2.94–106.51) were associated with successful induction. Higher BMI was associated with failed induction (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.75–0.99). Age, GA, Bishop score, and fetal birth weight were not associated with successful labor induction. The ROC curve showed a cervical length cutoff value of 3.415 cm, revealing 76.8% of the area under the curve. In conclusion, a shorter cervical length (≤3.415 cm) was associated with a higher chance of successful labor induction (76.8%). This parameter might be used to predict the chance of successful labor induction. This information could help better inform clinician discussions with pregnant women concerning the chance of successful labor induction and consequent decision-making. Nevertheless, further large-scale clinical trials are warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei-Chen Li & Wing Lam Tsui & Dah-Ching Ding, 2023. "The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1138-:d:1029279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1138-:d:1029279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.