IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i23p7126-d1291758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Consensus on the Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills Required for Effective Healthcare Service Delivery at District Hospitals in South Africa: A Delphi Study

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre-Andre Mans

    (Department of Family Medicine, Cecilia Makiwane Hospital, Mdantsane, East London 5201, South Africa
    Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5117, South Africa)

  • Parimalaranie Yogeswaran

    (Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5117, South Africa
    Department of Family Medicine, Mthatha Regional Hospital, Mthatha 5100, South Africa)

  • Oladele Vincent Adeniyi

    (Department of Family Medicine, Cecilia Makiwane Hospital, Mdantsane, East London 5201, South Africa
    Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5117, South Africa)

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread availability of ultrasound machines in South African district hospitals, there are no guidelines on the competency in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use required by generalist doctors in this setting. This study aimed to define the required POCUS competencies by means of consensus via the Delphi method. Methods: An online Delphi process was initiated in June 2022, using the existing American Academy of Family Physicians’ ultrasound curriculum (84 skillsets) as the starting questionnaire. Panelists were selected across the country, including two from district hospitals in each province and two from each academic family medicine department in South Africa ( N = 36). In each iterative round, the participants were asked to identify which POCUS skillsets were essential, optional (region-specific), or non-essential for South African district hospitals. This process continued until consensus (>70% agreement) was achieved on all of the skillsets. Results: Consensus was achieved on 81 of the 84 skillsets after 5 iterative rounds (96.4%), with 3 skillsets that could not achieve consensus (defined as <5% change over more than 2 consecutive rounds). The final consensus identified 38 essential, 28 optional, and 15 non-essential POCUS skillsets for the South African district hospital context. Conclusions: The list of essential POCUS skillsets provided by this study highlights the predominance of obstetric- and trauma-based skillsets required for generalist healthcare workers in South African district hospitals. The findings will require priority setting and revalidation prior to their implementation across the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre-Andre Mans & Parimalaranie Yogeswaran & Oladele Vincent Adeniyi, 2023. "Building Consensus on the Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills Required for Effective Healthcare Service Delivery at District Hospitals in South Africa: A Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(23), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:23:p:7126-:d:1291758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/23/7126/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/23/7126/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre-Andre Mans & Parimalaranie Yogeswaran & Oladele Vincent Adeniyi, 2022. "Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Study to Determine the Essential and Optional Ultrasound Skills for Medical Practitioners Working in District Hospitals in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-9, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:23:p:7126-:d:1291758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.