IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i22p7075-d1282321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Impact of Religious Affiliation and Strength of Religiosity on Sexual Health Practices of Sexually Active Female College Students

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Glazer

    (Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

  • Emma Valdez

    (Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

  • Justin A. DeBlauw

    (Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

  • Stephen J. Ives

    (Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA)

Abstract

Despite great strides in the development of contraceptive technologies, the United States has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the world. Religion and associated values may shape the sexual health behaviors of college students, as prior studies have aimed to determine how social factors may influence the use of contraception amongst college students. Thus, we sought to examine the differences in current contraceptive methods and the age of first contraceptive usage among sexually active female college students with different religious affiliations and strengths of religiosity. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in current contraceptive methods among different religious affiliations and strengths of religions and that there would be a difference in the age of first contraceptive usage among different religious affiliations and strengths of religiosity. Two hundred and twenty-four college-aged females completed a 20-question survey about sexual health and religious practices. Chi-squared tests were implemented to determine the frequencies of responses across religious affiliations and strengths of religiosity. Significant differences in the frequency of responses for the age of first contraceptive usage were observed across different strengths of religiosity ( p = 0.016) and for the self-perceived impact of religion on sexual health across different religious affiliations ( p = 0.033) and strengths of religiosity ( p = 0.005). All other differences were found not to be statistically significant. It was determined that increased strengths of religiosity resulted in delayed onset of contraceptive usage and that both different religious affiliations and greater strengths of religiosity lead to different self-perceived impacts of religion on sexual health despite low levels of current practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Glazer & Emma Valdez & Justin A. DeBlauw & Stephen J. Ives, 2023. "An Analysis of the Impact of Religious Affiliation and Strength of Religiosity on Sexual Health Practices of Sexually Active Female College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7075-:d:1282321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7075-:d:1282321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.