IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i22p7038-d1276534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Abnormal 50 g Glucose Challenge Tests in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand: A Retrospective Study

Author

Listed:
  • Suda Jaihow

    (School of Nursing, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Nonthapan Phasuk

    (Department of Medical Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
    Research Center in Tropical Pathobiology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Udomsak Narkkul

    (Research Center in Tropical Pathobiology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
    Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Wipawan Chaoum Pensuksan

    (Faculty of Nursing, Suratthani Rajabhat University, Surat Thani 84100, Thailand)

  • Stephen J. Scholand

    (Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA)

  • Chuchard Punsawad

    (Research Center in Tropical Pathobiology, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
    Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

Abstract

(1) Background: An abnormal 50 g glucose challenge test (50 g GCT) during pregnancy, even without a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), may result in undesirable obstetric and neonatal outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the outcomes in pregnant women with abnormal 50 g GCT in secondary care hospitals in Thailand. (2) Methods: A total of 1129 cases of pregnant women with abnormal 50 g GCT results who delivered between January 2018 and December 2020 at Thasala, Sichon, and Thungsong hospitals were retrospectively reviewed and divided into three groups: abnormal 50 g GCT and normal 100 g oral OGTT (Group 1; n = 397 cases), abnormal 50 g GCT and one abnormal 100 g OGTT value (Group 2; n = 452 cases), and GDM (Group 3; n = 307 cases). (3) Results: Cesarean section rates in group 3 (61.9%) were statistically higher than those in groups 1 (43.6%) and 2 (49.4%) ( p < 0.001). In addition, the highest rate of birth asphyxia was found in group 2 (5.9%), which was significantly higher than that in Groups 1 (1.8%) and 3 (3.3%) ( p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: Pregnant women with abnormal 50 g GCTs without a diagnosis of GDM had undesirable maternal and neonatal outcomes, as well as those who had GDM, suggesting that healthcare providers should closely monitor them throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Suggested Citation

  • Suda Jaihow & Nonthapan Phasuk & Udomsak Narkkul & Wipawan Chaoum Pensuksan & Stephen J. Scholand & Chuchard Punsawad, 2023. "Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Abnormal 50 g Glucose Challenge Tests in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand: A Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7038-:d:1276534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7038-:d:1276534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.