IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i1p864-d1023372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility and First Experiences from an Online Kidney School for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz

    (Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark
    Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
    Center for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark)

  • Stefan Rowald Petersen

    (Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark)

  • Tove Fibieger

    (Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark)

  • Jan Dominik Kampmann

    (Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark
    Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Eithne Hayes Bauer

    (Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark
    Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
    Center for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine patients’ and relatives’ experiences with participation in an online kidney school (OKS) and its influence on their choice of treatment modality; furthermore, to report on healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) first experiences with OKS. Methods : A mixed-methods design with parallel data collection involving two questionnaires for participants, including patients and relatives and a focus group discussion (FGD) with HCPs. Results : The OKS was feasible, and overall, patients and relatives were satisfied. Participation in the OKS increased the percentage of those who felt ready to make a decision regarding treatment. One over-arching theme ( evolvement of the online kidney school over time ) and three sub-themes ( concerns and perceived barriers, facilitators, and benefits and future possibilities ) emerged from the FGD. Conclusions: The OKS proved feasible, was well-accepted, and increased participants’ abilities to choose a preferred treatment modality. HCPs displayed initial concerns regarding the quality of the OKS and worried about the practicality of conducting the OKS. They experienced a feeling of something being lost. However, over time, HCPs developed strategies to tackle initial concerns and discovered that patients were more capable of participating than they had anticipated.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz & Stefan Rowald Petersen & Tove Fibieger & Jan Dominik Kampmann & Eithne Hayes Bauer, 2023. "Feasibility and First Experiences from an Online Kidney School for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:864-:d:1023372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:864-:d:1023372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.