IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i1p858-d1023130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Biosecurity on Biological and Psychosocial Risks for Health Workers of COVID Hospitals in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • María de la Luz Galván-Ramírez

    (Department of Microbiology Pathology, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad de Guadalajara, Sierra Mojada 950 Colonia Independencia, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico)

  • María de Lourdes Preciado-Serrano

    (Department of Public Health, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad de Guadalajara, Sierra Mojada 950 Colonia Independencia, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico)

  • Mildred Gallegos-Bonifaz

    (Department of Public Health, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad de Guadalajara, Sierra Mojada 950 Colonia Independencia, Guadalajara 44340, Mexico)

Abstract

Background: Some data support that health care workers (HCWs) must have sufficient and good quality personal protective equipment (PPE) and the necessary training to manage COVID patients to avoid contagion that can lead to death. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between biosafety on the biological risks of SARS-CoV-2 and risks of fatigue, anxiety, or depression in health workers who care for patients in COVID hospitals, from September 2020 to August 2021. Material and methods: The questionnaire used in this study (Q6S64I) consisted of 6 spheres: Sociodemographic aspects, working conditions; Personal Protection Equipment; safety and health; training and knowledge about COVID-19, the form of transport, and personal health conditions. The answers were online. The Goldberg questionnaire (EADG) measures anxiety and depression, and the questionnaire measures fatigue (Barrientos-Gutiérrez et al.) (PSSF). Results: In total, 76.5% of the HCWs were doctors, 25.2% worked in the emergency services, 79.3% received PPE from their institution, 82.9% cared for COVID-19 patients, and 27.9% tested positive for COVID-19. The PPE provided by the employer was 80%, but the quality was deficient, insufficient, and associated with a relative risk of 4.6. A total of 99% acquired better PPE on their own. The exposure to COVID-19 and the surgical mask provided by the institution had an associated relative risk of 2.8 for the HCWs. A total of 39% of the HCWs reported being calm. Conclusions: PPE, risk exposure, and safety at work were significantly associated with drowsiness and heaviness, difficulty concentrating, anxiety, and depression.

Suggested Citation

  • María de la Luz Galván-Ramírez & María de Lourdes Preciado-Serrano & Mildred Gallegos-Bonifaz, 2023. "The Impact of Biosecurity on Biological and Psychosocial Risks for Health Workers of COVID Hospitals in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:858-:d:1023130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/858/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/858/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:858-:d:1023130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.