IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i16p6622-d1221845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Betel Nut Intervention Trial (BENIT)—A Randomized Clinical Trial for Areca Nut and Betel Quid Cessation: Primary Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Thaddeus A. Herzog

    (University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Lynne R. Wilkens

    (University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Grazyna Badowski

    (University of Guam Cancer Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA)

  • Ana Joy Pacilan Mendez

    (University of Guam Cancer Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA)

  • Adrian A. Franke

    (University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Pallav Pokhrel

    (University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Jade S. N. Chennaux

    (University of Guam Cancer Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA)

  • Lynnette F. Tenorio

    (University of Guam Cancer Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA)

  • Patrick P. Sotto

    (University of Guam Cancer Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA)

  • Crissy T. Kawamoto

    (University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Yvette C. Paulino

    (University of Guam Cancer Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA)

Abstract

Background: Areca nut and betel quid (ANBQ) chewing is a widespread carcinogenic habit. The BENIT (ClinicalTrials—NCT02942745) is the first known randomized trial designed for ANBQ chewers. Methods: We compared the intensive behavioral treatment intervention condition (IC) with the control condition (CC) in the BENIT and included a 5-stage early stopping rule. We report the primary analysis at stage 3. English-literate adults in Guam and Saipan who self-identified as ANBQ chewers with tobacco were enrolled between August 2016 and August 2020. IC participants ( n = 88) received five in-person sessions over 22 days and a brochure containing quitting advice. CC participants ( n = 88) received only the brochure. Participants were assessed at baseline and on day 22 of follow-up. Self-reported chewing status at day 22 was determined by a composite of two survey items with disparate wording and response options for cross-verification. Results: Cessation rates were 38.6% (IC) and 9.1% (CC). Proportional hazards regression revealed a p = 0.0058, which met the Stage 3 criteria for significance, and an estimated reduction in ANBQ chewing for IC compared to the CC of 71% (95% CI: 41%–88%). Conclusions: Robust self-reported intervention effects at day 22 suggest that intensive cessation programs such as BENIT should be further developed and implemented on a larger scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Thaddeus A. Herzog & Lynne R. Wilkens & Grazyna Badowski & Ana Joy Pacilan Mendez & Adrian A. Franke & Pallav Pokhrel & Jade S. N. Chennaux & Lynnette F. Tenorio & Patrick P. Sotto & Crissy T. Kawamot, 2023. "The Betel Nut Intervention Trial (BENIT)—A Randomized Clinical Trial for Areca Nut and Betel Quid Cessation: Primary Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6622-:d:1221845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6622-:d:1221845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.