IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i16p6601-d1220103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Feasibility of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire among Women in Danish Antenatal Care: A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Helle Johnsen

    (Department of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Mette Juhl

    (Department of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Eva Rydahl

    (Department of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Sara Mbaye Karentius

    (Department of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Sabine Marie Rath

    (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300 Holbæk, Denmark)

  • Majbritt Friis-Alstrup

    (Department of Obstetrics, Slagelse Hospital, Fælledvej 13, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark)

  • Mette Grønbæk Backhausen

    (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Sygehusvej 10, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark)

  • Katrine Røhder

    (Department of Psychology, Copenhagen University, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
    The Family Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Pavillon 4, Østre Hospitalsvej 5A, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark)

  • Michaela Louise Schiøtz

    (Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

  • Lotte Broberg

    (Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark)

  • Vibeke de Lichtenberg

    (Department of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

A traumatic upbringing increases the risks of antenatal health problems, unfavourable pregnancy outcomes, and mental disorders. Such childhood experiences may affect women’s pa-renting skills and the social–emotional functioning of their children. Research on screening for adverse childhood experiences in antenatal care is limited. The objective of this study was to explore pregnant women’s attitudes towards and experiences of an adverse childhood experiences questionnaire, and to assess the relevance of the questionnaire among a population of pregnant women referred to antenatal care levels one and two, targeting women who are generally not perceived to be vulnerable. Data were collected at three maternity wards and consisted of quantitative data on 1352 women’s adverse childhood experience scores, structured observations of 18 midwifery visits, and in-depth interviews with 15 pregnant women. Quantitative data were analysed by descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed using systematic text condensation. The qualitative analysis revealed two main categories: “Being screened for childhood adversities” and “Having adverse childhood experiences”. In the study population, the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences was high. The women assessed the adverse childhood experiences questionnaire to be a relevant and acceptable screening method. Furthermore, women’s perceptions of their relationship with their midwife greatly impacted their attitudes towards and experiences of the questionnaire.

Suggested Citation

  • Helle Johnsen & Mette Juhl & Eva Rydahl & Sara Mbaye Karentius & Sabine Marie Rath & Majbritt Friis-Alstrup & Mette Grønbæk Backhausen & Katrine Røhder & Michaela Louise Schiøtz & Lotte Broberg & Vibe, 2023. "The Feasibility of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire among Women in Danish Antenatal Care: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6601-:d:1220103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6601-:d:1220103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.