IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i15p6494-d1208349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Lifestyle Habits and Quality of Life after Roux-in-Y Gastric Bypass in Brazilian Public versus Private Healthcare Systems: Beyond Weight Loss

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana S. Melendez-Araújo

    (Graduate Program of Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Ariene Silva do Carmo

    (Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro 70068-900, Brazil)

  • Flávio Teixeira Vieira

    (Graduate Program of Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Fernando Lamarca

    (Graduate Program of Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
    Department of Applied Nutrition, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro 23900-000, Brazil)

  • Eduardo Yoshio Nakano

    (Department of Statistics, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Ricardo M. Lima

    (Graduate Program of Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil
    Graduate Program in Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Eliane Said Dutra

    (Graduate Program of Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho

    (Graduate Program of Human Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Lifestyle and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are good markers of surgical obesity treatment. This study aimed to investigate the lifestyle and HRQoL of patients at least five years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in public (SUS) and private (PVT) Brazilian healthcare systems. In this cross-sectional study, weight loss (WL), % of excess WL (%EWL), diet quality, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and HRQoL were evaluated. Analysis of covariance, binary and multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for confounders, were performed. The SUS group had more vulnerable socioeconomic statuses than the PVT group. Total %WL and % EWL were 24.64 ± 0.99% and 60.46 ± 2.41%, respectively, without difference between groups. In the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression domains of HRQoL, more than 50% reported moderate problems without differences between groups. Processed food ingestion was higher in the PVT (132.10 ± 60.15 g/1000 kcal) than in the SUS (103.43 ± 41.72 g/1000 kcal), however, without statistical significance ( p = 0.093). The PVT group showed lower physical activity (OR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.87–0.63; p = 0.004) and a higher risk of alcohol-related problems (OR: 3.23; 95%CI; 1.03–10.10; p = 0.044) compared to SUS group. Participants generally achieved satisfactory WL, regardless of healthcare systems. However, PVT participants had unfavorable lifestyle characteristics, highlighting the need for studies investigating environmental issues post-bariatric surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana S. Melendez-Araújo & Ariene Silva do Carmo & Flávio Teixeira Vieira & Fernando Lamarca & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & Ricardo M. Lima & Eliane Said Dutra & Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho, 2023. "Long-Term Lifestyle Habits and Quality of Life after Roux-in-Y Gastric Bypass in Brazilian Public versus Private Healthcare Systems: Beyond Weight Loss," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6494-:d:1208349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6494/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6494/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6494-:d:1208349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.