IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i11p6042-d1163059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Updated Decision Aid Enabling Women to Choose between with or without Epidural Analgesia during Childbirth, and Confirmation of Validity

Author

Listed:
  • Eri Shishido

    (Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan)

  • Yumiko Arabiki

    (Makita General Hospital, Tokyo 144-8501, Japan)

  • Shigeko Horiuchi

    (Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan)

Abstract

Background: The use of a decision aid for choosing whether to have or not have anesthesia during childbirth has been shown to increase both knowledge about birth and the proportion of women who made their own decisions compared with women who did not use a decision aid. Herein, we updated the first version of our decision aid into a second version and evaluated this updated decision aid. We evaluated the face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid developed to enhance the ability of women to choose between childbirth with or without epidural analgesia. Methods: This was a descriptive study based on a literature review of updated information for addition to the first version. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched from 2003 to May 2021. Thereafter, obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and midwives were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding the face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid regarding whether it meets the IPDASi (Version 4.0) quality standards. Results: One obstetrician, one anesthesiologist, and three midwives who had performed epidural anesthesia for at least three years responded to the questionnaire. The responses to the evaluation items of face validity (i.e., style and clarity) were positive. There were 38 specific comments regarding content appropriateness classified into seven categories: “addition or revision of text”, “unification of expressions”, “need for explanation/information”, “lack of evidence”, “potential to mislead”, “questionable”, and “structure”. Conclusion: The face validity and content appropriateness of the updated decision aid was confirmed. The next step is evaluation of the updated decision aid by pregnant women who give birth.

Suggested Citation

  • Eri Shishido & Yumiko Arabiki & Shigeko Horiuchi, 2023. "Updated Decision Aid Enabling Women to Choose between with or without Epidural Analgesia during Childbirth, and Confirmation of Validity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:6042-:d:1163059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:6042-:d:1163059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.