IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i10p5908-d1152485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Individualized Coaching at Home on Quality of Life in Subacute Stroke Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Rodeline Telfils

    (HAVAE UR20217, University of Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France)

  • Axelle Gelineau

    (HAVAE UR20217, University of Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France)

  • Jean-Christophe Daviet

    (HAVAE UR20217, University of Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France
    Department PMR, CHU Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France)

  • Justine Lacroix

    (HAVAE UR20217, University of Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France)

  • Benoit Borel

    (HAVAE UR20217, University of Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France)

  • Emna Toulgui

    (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sahloul University Hospital, Sousse 4054, Tunisia)

  • Maxence Compagnat

    (HAVAE UR20217, University of Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France
    Department PMR, CHU Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France)

  • Stéphane Mandigout

    (HAVAE UR20217, University of Limoges, F-87000 Limoges, France)

Abstract

Background : Stroke causes psychological disorders and cognitive impairments that affect activities of daily living and quality of life. Physical activity (PA) in stroke recovery is beneficial. The benefits of PA on quality of life after stroke are less documented. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of a home-based PA incentive program at home in post-stroke patients in the subacute phase on quality of life. Methods : This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, and monocentric clinical trial. Eighty-three patients were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (EG; n = 42) or to a control group (CG; n = 41). The experimental group followed a home-based PA incentive program for 6 months. Three incentive methods were used: daily monitoring with an accelerometer, weekly telephone calls, and home visits every three weeks. Patients were evaluated before intervention (T0) and after intervention (T1) at 6 months. The control group was a non-intervention group receiving usual care. The outcome was the quality of life with the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L evaluated at baseline and 6 months post-intervention. Results : The mean age was 62.2 years ± 13.6 with a post-stroke time of 77.9 ± 45.1 days. The mean values of the utility index (EQ-5D-5L) in the control group and experimental group at T1 were 0.721 ± 0.207 and 0.808 ± 0.193, respectively ( p = 0.02). Discussion : Our study shows a significant difference in the Global QOL index (EQ-5D-5L) between the two groups of subacute stroke patients after 6 months of the individualized coaching program, which combined home visits and weekly telephone calls.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodeline Telfils & Axelle Gelineau & Jean-Christophe Daviet & Justine Lacroix & Benoit Borel & Emna Toulgui & Maxence Compagnat & Stéphane Mandigout, 2023. "Effect of Individualized Coaching at Home on Quality of Life in Subacute Stroke Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5908-:d:1152485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5908-:d:1152485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.