IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p498-d1017831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of Mild Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Author

Listed:
  • Qingmin Dai

    (Ecology College, Lishui University, No. 1 Xueyuan Road, Lishui 323000, China)

  • Hong Su

    (Department of Nursing, Daqing Campus, University of Harbin Medical, 39 Shinyo Road, Daqing 163319, China)

  • Zanhua Zhou

    (Medicine College, Lishui University, No. 1 Xueyuan Road, Lishui 323000, China)

  • Caifu Li

    (Medicine College, Lishui University, No. 1 Xueyuan Road, Lishui 323000, China)

  • Jihua Zou

    (Medicine College, Lishui University, No. 1 Xueyuan Road, Lishui 323000, China)

  • Ying Zhou

    (Medicine College, Lishui University, No. 1 Xueyuan Road, Lishui 323000, China)

  • Rhayun Song

    (Nursing College, Chungnam National University, 266 Munwha-dong, Daejeon 35015, Republic of Korea)

  • Yang Liu

    (Department of Nursing, Daqing Campus, University of Harbin Medical, 39 Shinyo Road, Daqing 163319, China)

  • Lijuan Xu

    (Medicine College, Lishui University, No. 1 Xueyuan Road, Lishui 323000, China)

  • Yuqiu Zhou

    (Department of Nursing, Daqing Campus, University of Harbin Medical, 39 Shinyo Road, Daqing 163319, China)

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of instruments for measuring quality of life (QOL) in Chinese patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study aimed to translate the Mild Cognitive Questionnaire (MCQ) into the Chinese language and to evaluate the reliability and construct validity of the MCQ-Chinese among older adults with MCI. Methods: Linguistic translation and validation of the questionnaire were conducted according to the MCQ developer and Oxford University Innovation guidelines. After a pilot test, the final version of the MCQ-Chinese was applied to a convenience sample of older adults with MCI (n = 186). Cronbach’s alpha and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess the reliability and construct validity of the MCQ-Chinese. In addition, non-parametric analysis was used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The total scale and all the factors had good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.90 to 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated satisfactory goodness of fit for the 2-factor MCQ. The MCQ-Chinese had a good convergent validity, and the discriminant validity was confirmed with a significant difference in MCQ scores in different health conditions. Conclusions: MCQ-Chinese is a reliable tool for assessing QOL among Chinese older adults with MCI.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingmin Dai & Hong Su & Zanhua Zhou & Caifu Li & Jihua Zou & Ying Zhou & Rhayun Song & Yang Liu & Lijuan Xu & Yuqiu Zhou, 2022. "Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of Mild Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:498-:d:1017831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:498-:d:1017831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.