IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p439-d1016663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Transtibial Prosthesis Type on Lower-Body Gait Adaptation: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Yosra Cherni

    (Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada)

  • Simon Laurendeau

    (Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada
    Department of Kinesiology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Maxime Robert

    (Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
    Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada)

  • Katia Turcot

    (Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada
    Department of Kinesiology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

Abstract

Gait parameters are altered and asymmetrical in individuals with transtibial amputation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of four different prosthetic feet on lower-limb biomechanics during gait. A 34-year-old man with transtibial amputation performed four gait analysis sessions with four foot–ankle prostheses (Variflex, Meridium, Echelon, and Kinterra). Kinematic and kinetic parameters and gait symmetry were analyzed in different prosthetic conditions. The type of prosthesis had little effect on the participant’s spatiotemporal parameters. Throughout the stance phase, increased hip angle, reduced knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion were observed in the amputated leg. For kinetic parameters, reduced propulsive force (SI = 0.42–0.65), reduced knee extension moment (mainly during Echelon and Kinterra conditions, SI = 0.17 and 0.32, respectively), and increased knee abduction moment (mainly during the Variflex and Meridium, SI = 5.74 and 8.93, respectively) were measured in the amputated leg. Lower support moments were observed in the amputated leg as compared to the unaffected leg, regardless of the type of prosthesis (SI = 0.61–0.80). The prostheses tested induced different lower-limb mechanical adaptations. In order to achieve the clinical goal of better gait symmetry between lower limbs, an objective gait analysis could help clinicians to prescribe prosthetic feet based on quantitative measurement indicators to optimize gait rehabilitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yosra Cherni & Simon Laurendeau & Maxime Robert & Katia Turcot, 2022. "The Influence of Transtibial Prosthesis Type on Lower-Body Gait Adaptation: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:439-:d:1016663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:439-:d:1016663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.