IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5743-d811226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal Stress and Excessive Weight Gain in Infancy

Author

Listed:
  • Katelyn Fox

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Maya Vadiveloo

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Karen McCurdy

    (Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA)

  • Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon

    (Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Truls Østbye

    (Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

  • Alison Tovar

    (Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA)

Abstract

Rapid weight gain in infancy increases the risk of developing obesity early in life and contributes significantly to racial and ethnic disparities in childhood obesity. While maternal perceived stress is associated with childhood obesity, little is known about the impact it has on infant weight gain. Therefore, this study explores the impact of maternal perceived stress on change in weight-for-length (WFL) z-scores and the risk of rapid weight gain in infancy. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the longitudinal Nurture birth cohort ( n = 666). Most mothers in the cohort were non-Hispanic/Latinx Black (71.6%). About one-half of mothers had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 prior to pregnancy, were unemployed, and had a low income. Most infants in the cohort were born full-term and were of normal weight. Data were collected at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months postpartum. At each assessment, mothers completed the Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and research assistants weighed and measured each infant. Tertiles were used to compare mothers with high and low perceived stress. A mixed model analysis of repeated measures assessed the associations between baseline perceived stress and the change in infant WFL z-scores over time. Log-binomial models assessed the association between baseline perceived stress and rapid weight gain, defined as a change in WFL z-score > 0.67 standard deviations from three to twelve months. Just under one-half of the infants (47%) experienced rapid weight gain between three and twelve months of age. Birthweight for gestational age (RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.08–1.29, p -value = 0.004), gestational age at birth (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14, p -value = 0.031), and weeks breastfed (0.99, 95% CI 0.99–1.00, p -value 0.044) were associated with risk of rapid weight gain in unadjusted analyses. WFL z-scores increased significantly over time, with no effect of perceived stress on change in WFL z-score or risk of rapid weight gain. Rapid weight gain in infancy was prevalent in this sample of predominately Black infants in the Southeastern US. We did not find evidence to support the hypothesis that maternal perceived stress influenced the risk of rapid weight gain. More work is needed to identify and assess the risk factors for rapid weight gain in infancy and to understand the role that maternal stress plays in the risk of childhood obesity so that prevention efforts can be targeted.

Suggested Citation

  • Katelyn Fox & Maya Vadiveloo & Karen McCurdy & Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon & Truls Østbye & Alison Tovar, 2022. "Maternal Stress and Excessive Weight Gain in Infancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5743-:d:811226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Purna Mukhopadhyay, 2015. "Multiple Imputation of Missing Data Using SAS," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 326-327, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5743-:d:811226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.