IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5307-d803294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Type of Findings Generated by the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago S. Jesus

    (Center for Education in Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA)

  • Karthik Mani

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA)

  • Claudia von Zweck

    (World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Sureshkumar Kamalakannan

    (Department of Social Work, Education and Community Well-Being, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK)

  • Sutanuka Bhattacharjya

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA)

  • Ritchard Ledgerd

    (World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), 1211 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • on behalf of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists

    (Access to membership of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists is provided in the Supplementary Materials.)

Abstract

Occupational therapists are needed to meet the health and occupational needs of the global population, but we know little about the type of findings generated by occupational therapy workforce research conducted worldwide. We aim to synthesize these findings and their range of content to inform future investigations. A scoping review with content analysis was used. Six scientific databases, websites of official institutions, snowballing, and key informants were used for searches. Two independent reviewers took selection decisions against the eligibility criteria published a priori in the review protocol. Of the 1246 unique references detected, 57 papers were included for the last 25 years. A total of 18 papers addressed issues of attractiveness and retention, often in Australia, and 14 addressed the issues of supply, demand, and distribution, often in the US. Only these two categories generated subtopics. Many workforce issues were rarely addressed as a main topic (e.g., race/ethnic representation). Cross-national, cross-regional, or cross-professional studies generated more actionable findings. Overall, we found few discernable trends, minimal evidence of research programs, and various gaps in content coverage or in the use of contemporary research approaches. There is a need for a coordinated strengthening of the occupational therapy workforce research worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago S. Jesus & Karthik Mani & Claudia von Zweck & Sureshkumar Kamalakannan & Sutanuka Bhattacharjya & Ritchard Ledgerd & on behalf of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists, 2022. "Type of Findings Generated by the Occupational Therapy Workforce Research Worldwide: Scoping Review and Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5307-:d:803294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5307/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5307/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5307-:d:803294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.