IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p4966-d797273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method for the Analysis of Glyphosate, Aminomethylphosphonic Acid, and Glufosinate in Human Urine Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong-Min Li

    (Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA)

  • Kurunthachalam Kannan

    (Department of Pediatrics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    King Fahd Medical Research Center, Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science and Experimental Biochemistry Unit, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 80200, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The extensive use of herbicides, such as glyphosate and glufosinate, in crop production during recent decades has raised concerns about human exposure. Nevertheless, analysis of trace levels of these herbicides in human biospecimens has been challenging. Here, we describe a method for the determination of urinary glyphosate, its degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), and glufosinate using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The method was optimized using isotopically labelled internal standards ( 13 C 2 , 15 N-glyphosate, 13 C, 15 N, D 2 -AMPA, and D 3 -glufosinate) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) with cation-exchange and anion-exchange cartridges. The method provides excellent chromatographic retention, resolution and peak shape of target analytes without the need for strong acidic mobile phases and derivatization steps. The instrument linearity was in the range of 0.1–100 ng/mL, with R > 0.99 in the matrix for all analytes. The method detection limits (MDLs) and the method quantification limits (MQLs) were in the ranges of 0.12 (AMPA and glufosinate)–0.14 (glyphosate) ng/mL and 0.40 (AMPA)–0.48 (glyphosate) ng/mL, respectively. The recoveries of analytes spiked into urine matrix ranged from 79.1% to 119%, with coefficients of variation (CVs) of 4–10%. Repeated analysis of samples for over 2 weeks showed intra-day and inter-day analytical variations of 3.13–10.8% and 5.93–12.9%, respectively. The matrix effects for glyphosate, AMPA, and glufosinate spiked into urine matrix averaged −14.4%, 13.2%, and 22.2%, respectively. The method was further validated through the analysis of external quality assurance proficiency test (PT) urine samples. The method offers optimal sensitivity, accuracy, and precision for the urine-based assessment of human exposure to glyphosate, AMPA, and glufosinate.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong-Min Li & Kurunthachalam Kannan, 2022. "A Method for the Analysis of Glyphosate, Aminomethylphosphonic Acid, and Glufosinate in Human Urine Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:4966-:d:797273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/4966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/4966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:4966-:d:797273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.