IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4865-d795599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture Requests and Multi-Drug Resistance among Suspected Urinary Tract Infections in Two Tertiary Hospitals in Freetown, Sierra Leone (2017–21): A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Julian S. O. Campbell

    (Ola During Children’s Hospital (ODCH) and Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) Laboratory, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown 00232, Sierra Leone)

  • Saskia van Henten

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Zikan Koroma

    (Directorate of Laboratory, Diagnostics and Blood Services, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown 00232, Sierra Leone)

  • Ibrahim Franklyn Kamara

    (Infection Prevention and Control Unit-Health Security and Emergency Cluster, World Health Organization Country Office, Freetown 00232, Sierra Leone)

  • Gladys N. Kamara

    (Joint Medical Unit, Ministry of Defense, Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces, Freetown 00232, Sierra Leone)

  • Hemant Deepak Shewade

    (Division of Health System Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE), Chennai 600077, India)

  • Anthony D. Harries

    (Centre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), 2 Rue Jean Lantier, 75001 Paris, France
    Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, there is limited information about the use of microbiology laboratory services in patients with suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs). This cross-sectional study assessed the requests for urine culture in patients with suspected UTI in two tertiary (maternal and paediatric) hospitals—Freetown and Sierra Leone, during May 2017–May 2021—and determined antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns among bacterial isolates. One laboratory served the two hospitals, with its electronic database used to extract information. Overall, there were 980 patients, of whom 168 (17%) had cultures requested and performed. Of these, 75 (45%) were culture positive. During 2017–2019, there were 930 patients, of whom 156 (17%) had cultures performed. During 2020–2021, when services were disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, there were 50 patients, of whom 12 (24%) had cultures performed. The four commonest isolates were Escherichia coli (36), Klebsiella pneumoniae (10), Staphylococcus aureus (9), and Pseudomonas spp. (6). There were high levels of AMR, especially for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (47%), nalidixic acid (44%), nitrofurantoin (32%) and cefotaxime (36%). Overall, 41 (55%) bacterial isolates showed multidrug resistance, especially E. coli (58%), Pseudomonas spp. (50%), and S. aureus (44%). These findings support the need for better utilization of clinical microbiology services to guide antibiotic stewardship and monitoring of trends in resistance patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Julian S. O. Campbell & Saskia van Henten & Zikan Koroma & Ibrahim Franklyn Kamara & Gladys N. Kamara & Hemant Deepak Shewade & Anthony D. Harries, 2022. "Culture Requests and Multi-Drug Resistance among Suspected Urinary Tract Infections in Two Tertiary Hospitals in Freetown, Sierra Leone (2017–21): A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4865-:d:795599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4865-:d:795599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.