IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4795-d794452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relation of Surgical Procedures and Diagnosis Groups to Unplanned Readmission in Spinal Neurosurgery: A Retrospective Single Center Study

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Sander

    (Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Henry Oppermann

    (Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
    Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Ulf Nestler

    (Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Katharina Sander

    (Independent Researcher, 12437 Berlin, Germany)

  • Michael Karl Fehrenbach

    (Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Tim Wende

    (Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Nikolaus von Dercks

    (Department for Medical Controlling, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Jürgen Meixensberger

    (Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

Background: Unplanned readmission has gained increasing interest as a quality marker for inpatient care, as it is associated with patient mortality and higher economic costs. Spinal neurosurgery is characterized by a lack of epidemiologic readmission data. The aim of this study was to identify causes and predictors for unplanned readmissions related to index diagnoses and surgical procedures. Methods: In this study, from 2015 to 2017, spinal neurosurgical procedures were recorded for surgical and non-surgical treated patients. The main reasons for an unplanned readmission within 30 days following discharge were identified. Multivariate logarithmic regression revealed predictors of unplanned readmission. Results: A total of 1172 patient records were examined, of which 4.27% disclosed unplanned readmissions. Among the surgical patients, the readmission rate was 4.06%, mainly attributable to surgical site infections, while it was 5.06% for the non-surgical patients, attributable to uncontrolled pain. A night-time surgery presented as the independent predictive factor. Conclusion: In the heterogeneous group of spinal neurosurgical patients, stratification into diagnostic groups is necessary for statistical analysis. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and spinal abscesses are mainly affected by unplanned readmission. The surgical procedure dorsal root ganglion stimulation is an independent predictor of unplanned re-hospitalizations, as is the timing of surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Sander & Henry Oppermann & Ulf Nestler & Katharina Sander & Michael Karl Fehrenbach & Tim Wende & Nikolaus von Dercks & Jürgen Meixensberger, 2022. "The Relation of Surgical Procedures and Diagnosis Groups to Unplanned Readmission in Spinal Neurosurgery: A Retrospective Single Center Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4795-:d:794452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4795-:d:794452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.