IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4771-d794181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Representations of Sexuality among Persons with Intellectual Disability, as Perceived by Professionals in Specialized Institutions: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara Guenoun

    (Centre de Recherche en Psychopathologie et Psychologie Clinique (CRPPC), Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69365 Lyon, France)

  • Barbara Smaniotto

    (Centre de Recherche en Psychopathologie et Psychologie Clinique (CRPPC), Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69365 Lyon, France)

  • Christophe Clesse

    (Center for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK)

  • Marion Mauran-Mignorat

    (Centre de Recherche en Psychopathologie et Psychologie Clinique (CRPPC), Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69365 Lyon, France)

  • Estelle Veyron-Lacroix

    (Centre de Recherche en Psychopathologie et Psychologie Clinique (CRPPC), Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69365 Lyon, France
    Laboratoire Inter-Universitaire de Psychologie (LIP), Université de Grenoble-Alpes, 38058 Grenoble, France)

  • Albert Ciccone

    (Centre de Recherche en Psychopathologie et Psychologie Clinique (CRPPC), Université Lumière-Lyon 2, 69365 Lyon, France)

  • Aziz Essadek

    (Laboratoire INTERPSY, Université de Lorraine, 54052 Nancy, France)

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review is to make an inventory of the representations of the professionals of specialized institutions on the sexuality of persons with intellectual disabilities. The scientific studies were identified according to the PRISMA protocol using 18 databases, with keywords on sexuality and parenthood. Studies were reviewed through a methodological assessment and then a thematic analysis. Twenty-four studies were reviewed and three themes were identified: professionals’ representations of gender, sexuality, and consent; professionals’ perceptions of their role in supporting people’s sexual lives; and the ways in which professionals construct representations of people’s sexual lives. This corpus highlights deep paradoxes in the representations of professionals concerning the socio-affective needs and sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities, creating what we could define as a “system of incompatibility” and leading to difficulties in positioning. Support is still too random and subject to control logics in the name of protecting users, who are perceived as vulnerable. Training and new ways of teamwork appear to be central to supporting the evolution of the representations and practices of professionals. Future research anchored in practices and involving users as well as professionals is necessary to better understand the paradoxical aspects of professionals’ representations and to draw alternative ways of constructing these representations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara Guenoun & Barbara Smaniotto & Christophe Clesse & Marion Mauran-Mignorat & Estelle Veyron-Lacroix & Albert Ciccone & Aziz Essadek, 2022. "Representations of Sexuality among Persons with Intellectual Disability, as Perceived by Professionals in Specialized Institutions: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4771-:d:794181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4771-:d:794181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.