IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4672-d792608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individualized Analysis of Lateral Asymmetry Using Hip-Knee Angular Measures in Soccer Players: A New Methodological Perspective of Assessment for Lower Limb Asymmetry

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar García-García

    (Laboratory of Sports Performance, Physical Condition and Wellness, Faculty of Education and Sports, University of Vigo, 36310 Pontevedra, Spain)

  • Ángela Molina-Cárdenas

    (University of Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain)

  • Tania Álvarez-Yates

    (Laboratory of Sports Performance, Physical Condition and Wellness, Faculty of Education and Sports, University of Vigo, 36310 Pontevedra, Spain)

  • Mario Iglesias-Caamaño

    (Laboratory of Sports Performance, Physical Condition and Wellness, Faculty of Education and Sports, University of Vigo, 36310 Pontevedra, Spain)

  • Virginia Serrano-Gómez

    (Laboratory of Sports Performance, Physical Condition and Wellness, Faculty of Education and Sports, University of Vigo, 36310 Pontevedra, Spain)

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) determine the magnitude and direction of lateral asymmetry in well-trained soccer players using hip and knee ROM tests; (2) inquire if asymmetry relies on the ROM test performed and/or gender; and (3) establish asymmetry thresholds for each ROM test to individualize lower-limbs asymmetry. One hundred amateur soccer players were assessed using hip–knee ROM tests: Straight Leg Raise, modified Thomas Test, hip internal rotation and external rotation, hip abduction (ABD) and adduction (ADD), Nachlas Test and Rigde Test. There are significant differences between tests when determining the magnitude of lateral asymmetry (F = 3.451; p = 0.001; η p 2 = 0.031) without significant differences between gender (F = 0.204; p = 0.651; η p 2 = 0.001). Asymmetry threshold results differ significantly between using a fixed or a specific threshold (F = 65.966; p = 0.001; η p 2 = 0.985). All tests indicate that the direction of asymmetry is towards the dominant limb. In conclusion, the ROM test used determines the magnitude and direction of the lateral asymmetry of the amateur soccer players. The ABD and ADD are the ROM tests that showed higher percentages of asymmetry, without differences between female and male soccer players. Using a specific asymmetry threshold formula can classify more players as asymmetrical than with a fixed threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar García-García & Ángela Molina-Cárdenas & Tania Álvarez-Yates & Mario Iglesias-Caamaño & Virginia Serrano-Gómez, 2022. "Individualized Analysis of Lateral Asymmetry Using Hip-Knee Angular Measures in Soccer Players: A New Methodological Perspective of Assessment for Lower Limb Asymmetry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4672-:d:792608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Víctor Moreno-Pérez & Gil Rodas & Marcelo Peñaranda-Moraga & Álvaro López-Samanes & Daniel Romero-Rodríguez & Per Aagaard & Juan Del Coso, 2022. "Effects of Football Training and Match-Play on Hamstring Muscle Strength and Passive Hip and Ankle Range of Motion during the Competitive Season," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cesar Cavinato Cal Abad & Marcos Winicius Rodrigues Lopes & Jerusa Petróvna Resende Lara & Anderson Jose Santana Oliveira & Raphael Planas Correa da Silva & Elder Aparecido Facin & Antonio Jose Izar &, 2022. "Long-Term Changes in Vertical Jump, H:Q Ratio and Interlimb Asymmetries in Young Female Volleyball Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4672-:d:792608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.