IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p4213-d785330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intercomparison of Radon Flux Monitors at Low and at High Radium Content Areas under Field Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Rábago

    (Radon Group, University of Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Luis Quindós

    (Radon Group, University of Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Arturo Vargas

    (Laboratory of 222Rn Studies, Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Carlos Sainz

    (Radon Group, University of Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Ileana Radulescu

    (Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 077125 Magurele, Romania)

  • Mihail-Razvan Ioan

    (Horia Hulubei National Institute for R&D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 077125 Magurele, Romania)

  • Francesco Cardellini

    (National Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology (INMRI)—Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco Capogni

    (National Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology (INMRI)—Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Alessandro Rizzo

    (Radiation Protection Institute (IRP)—Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Santiago Celaya

    (Radon Group, University of Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Ismael Fuente

    (Radon Group, University of Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Marta Fuente

    (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, (LSCE-IPSL), CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France)

  • Maria Rodriguez

    (Laboratory of 222Rn Studies, Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Claudia Grossi

    (Laboratory of 222Rn Studies, Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Interlaboratory exercises are a good tool to compare the response of different systems to the same quantity and to identify possible inconsistencies between them. One of the main goals of the EMPIR 19ENV01 traceRadon project is to harmonize radon flux measurements based on different systems and methodologies. In the framework of the traceRadon Project, two radon flux intercomparison campaigns were carried out in October 2021 at high and at low radon source areas. Four institutions participated in the field intercomparison exercises with their own systems. Every system was based on a specific radon monitor (diffusion or pump mode) and an accumulation chamber (with manual or automatic opening). Radon fluxes were calculated by each participant using both exponential and linear fittings of the radon activity concentration measured over time within the accumulation chambers. The results of this study show mainly: (i) the exponential approach is not advisable due to the variability of the radon flux and the leakage of the systems during long-time measurements; (ii) the linear approach should be applied to minimize the measurement period in agreement with the time response and sensitivity of the monitors; (iii) radon flux measured at high radon source areas (radium content of about 800 Bq kg −1 ) risks being underestimated because of the influence of advective effects; (iv) radon flux measured at low radon source areas (radium content of about 30 Bq kg −1 ) may present large uncertainties if sensitive radon monitors with pump mode are not used.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Rábago & Luis Quindós & Arturo Vargas & Carlos Sainz & Ileana Radulescu & Mihail-Razvan Ioan & Francesco Cardellini & Marco Capogni & Alessandro Rizzo & Santiago Celaya & Ismael Fuente & Marta , 2022. "Intercomparison of Radon Flux Monitors at Low and at High Radium Content Areas under Field Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4213-:d:785330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4213/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4213/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timofey Leshukov & Konstantin Legoshchin & Aleksey Larionov, 2023. "Radon Hazard of the Zhurinsky Fault for the Population in the Kuznetsk Coal Basin: Primary Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4213-:d:785330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.