IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p4143-d784130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of a Qualitative Instrument to Assess High-Risk Mechanisms during a 90° Change of Direction in Female Football Players

Author

Listed:
  • Alba Aparicio-Sarmiento

    (Research Group “Raquis: Aparato Locomotor y Deporte”, Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain)

  • Raquel Hernández-García

    (Research Group “Raquis: Aparato Locomotor y Deporte”, Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain)

  • Antonio Cejudo

    (Research Group “Raquis: Aparato Locomotor y Deporte”, Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain)

  • José Manuel Palao

    (Scientific Association of Research Groups “Sport Performance Analysis Association”, 30720 Murcia, Spain
    Department of Health, Exercise Science & Sport Management, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, WI 53144, USA
    https://www.um.es/spaa/ .)

  • Pilar Sainz de Baranda

    (Research Group “Raquis: Aparato Locomotor y Deporte”, Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain)

Abstract

Sidestep cuts between 60° and 180° and one-leg landings have been identified as the main mechanisms of ACL injuries in several sports. This study sought to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability of a qualitative tool to assess high-risk movements in a 90° change of direction when the test is applied in a real framework of sport practice. Female footballers from two teams ( n = 38) participated in this study and were asked to perform 90° cutting trials to each side, which were simultaneously filmed from a frontal and a sagittal view. A total of 61 cases were selected for 2D qualitative observational analysis by three raters. Poor reliability was found among each pair of raters as well as moderate reliability when the Cutting Movement Assessment Score (CMAS) was given by the same rater at different moments, but with too high a minimum detectable change. On the other hand, raters presented a significant, as well as moderate-to-good intra-rater reliability for most items of the CMAS tool. There was, however, non-significant reliability between observers in rating most check-points of the tool. For these reasons, more objective guidelines and clearer definitions for each criterion within the CMAS, as well as a longer, standardised training period for novel observers, would be highly recommended to improve the reliability of this tool in an applied context with female footballers.

Suggested Citation

  • Alba Aparicio-Sarmiento & Raquel Hernández-García & Antonio Cejudo & José Manuel Palao & Pilar Sainz de Baranda, 2022. "Reliability of a Qualitative Instrument to Assess High-Risk Mechanisms during a 90° Change of Direction in Female Football Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4143-:d:784130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raquel Hernández-García & María Isabel Gil-López & David Martínez-Pozo & María Teresa Martínez-Romero & Alba Aparicio-Sarmiento & Antonio Cejudo & Pilar Sainz de Baranda & Chris Bishop, 2020. "Validity and Reliability of the New Basic Functional Assessment Protocol (BFA)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-35, July.
    2. María Teresa Martínez-Romero & Francisco Ayala & Mark De Ste Croix & Francisco J. Vera-Garcia & Pilar Sainz de Baranda & Fernando Santonja-Medina & Julio Sánchez-Meca, 2020. "A Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Four Field-Based Trunk Extension Endurance Tests," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Alba Roldan & José M. Sarabia & Guillermo Gómez-Marcos & Raul Reina, 2020. "An Observational Tool to Assess Activity Limitation in Ambulatory People with Cerebral Palsy When Performing Motor Skills," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongmei Zhu & Di Zhang & Lei Gao & Huixin Liu & Yonghui Di & Bing Xie & Wei Jiao & Xiuli Sun, 2022. "Effect of Pelvic Floor Workout on Pelvic Floor Muscle Function Recovery of Postpartum Women: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Diego Miñambres-Martín & Patricia Martín-Casas & Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva & César Fernández-de-las-Peñas & Juan Antonio Valera-Calero & Gustavo Plaza-Manzano, 2022. "Physical Function in Amateur Athletes with Lumbar Disc Herniation and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Case-Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    3. José M. Sarabia & Alba Roldan & Matías Henríquez & Raul Reina, 2021. "Using Decision Trees to Support Classifiers’ Decision-Making about Activity Limitation of Cerebral Palsy Footballers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4143-:d:784130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.