IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p4094-d783061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardising Training of Nurses in an Evidence-Based Psychosocial Intervention for Perinatal Depression: Randomized Trial of Electronic vs. Face-to-Face Training in China

Author

Listed:
  • Anum Nisar

    (Health Science Centre, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Juan Yin

    (School of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China)

  • Yiping Nan

    (Health Science Centre, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Huanyuan Luo

    (Global Health Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK)

  • Dongfang Han

    (Health Science Centre, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Lei Yang

    (Health Science Centre, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Jiaying Li

    (Health Science Centre, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Duolao Wang

    (Global Health Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK)

  • Atif Rahman

    (Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK)

  • Xiaomei Li

    (Health Science Centre, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

Background: Rates of perinatal depression in China are high. The Thinking Healthy Programme is a WHO-endorsed, evidence-based psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression, requiring five days of face-to-face training by a specialist trainer. Given the paucity of specialist trainers and logistical challenges, standardized training of large numbers of nurses is a major challenge for scaling up. We developed an electronic training programme (e-training) which eliminates the need for specialist-led, face-to-face training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the e-training compared to conventional face-to-face training in nursing students. Methods: A single blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted. One hundred nursing students from two nursing schools were randomly assigned to either e-training or conventional face-to-face training. Results: E-training was not inferior to specialist-led face-to-face training immediately post-training [mean ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors (ENACT) score (M) 45.73, standard deviation (SD) 4.03 vs. M 47.08, SD 4.53; mean difference (MD) −1.35, 95% CI; (−3.17, 0.46), p = 0.14]. There was no difference in ENACT scores at three months [M = 42.16, SD 4.85 vs. M = 42.65, SD 4.65; MD = −0.481, 95% CI; (−2.35, 1.39), p = 0.61]. Conclusions: E-training is a promising tool with comparative effectiveness to specialist-led face-to-face training. E-training can be used for training of non-specialists for evidence-based psychosocial interventions at scale and utilized where there is a shortage of specialist trainers, but practice under supervision is necessary to maintain competence. However, continued practice under supervision may be necessary to maintain competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Anum Nisar & Juan Yin & Yiping Nan & Huanyuan Luo & Dongfang Han & Lei Yang & Jiaying Li & Duolao Wang & Atif Rahman & Xiaomei Li, 2022. "Standardising Training of Nurses in an Evidence-Based Psychosocial Intervention for Perinatal Depression: Randomized Trial of Electronic vs. Face-to-Face Training in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4094-:d:783061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/4094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:4094-:d:783061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.