IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p3832-d778039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phytoplankton Composition and Ecological Status of Lakes with Cyanobacteria Dominance

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Poniewozik

    (Department of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Health, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1I, PL-20-708 Lublin, Poland)

  • Tomasz Lenard

    (Department of Animal Physiology and Toxicology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Health, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1I, PL-20-708 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Phytoplankton is one of the five biological quality elements used in the assessment of the ecological status of surface waters according to the European Water Framework Directive established in 2000. In this study, we determined the ecological status of three small and shallow lakes in the Polesie Plain, Eastern Poland, by using indices based on phytoplankton assemblages. The predominant phytoplankton of all three lakes were filamentous cyanobacteria, both heterocystous and non-heterocystous, represented by the genera Aphanizomenon , Planktothrix , Limnothrix, and Planktolyngbya . We used the Hungarian Q index, German PSI (Phyto-See-Index), and recently developed PMPL (Phytoplankton Metrics for Polish Lakes) for Polish lakes. We compared the results from the calculation of the indices to physicochemical data obtained from the lake water and Carlson’s Trophy State Index (TSI). On the basis of TSI, Gumienek and Glinki lakes were classified as advanced eutrophic, whereas Czarne Lake had a better score and was classified as slightly eutrophic. The trophic state was generally confirmed by the ecological status based on phytoplankton indices and also showed the diverse ecological situation in the lakes studied. Based on the Polish PMPL, Gumienek Lake was classified as having bad status (ecological quality ratio (EQR) = 0.05), whereas Glinki and Czarne lakes were classified within the poor status range (EQR = 0.25 and 0.35, respectively). However, based on the German PSI, the lakes were classified in a different manner: the status of Gumienek and Czarne lakes was better, but unsatisfactory, because they were still below the boundary for the good status category recommended by the European Commission. The best ecological status for the studied lakes was obtained using the Q index: Gumienek Lake with EQR = 0.42 had a moderate status, and Czarne Lake with EQR = 0.62 obtained a good status. However, Glinki Lake, with EQR = 0.40, was classified at the boundary for poor and moderate status. Based on our study, it seems that the best index for ecological status assessment based on phytoplankton that can be used for small lakes is the Polish (PMPL) index.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Poniewozik & Tomasz Lenard, 2022. "Phytoplankton Composition and Ecological Status of Lakes with Cyanobacteria Dominance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3832-:d:778039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3832/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3832/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3832-:d:778039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.