IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3704-d775501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Early Warning System for the Differential Diagnosis of In-Hospital Acute Kidney Injury for Better Patient Outcome: Study of a Quality Improvement Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Ming-Ju Wu

    (Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
    Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan)

  • Shih-Che Huang

    (Division of Clinical Information, Center of Quality Management, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan)

  • Cheng-Hsu Chen

    (Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
    Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
    Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan)

  • Ching-Yao Cheng

    (Department of Pharmacy, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
    School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan)

  • Shang-Feng Tsai

    (Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
    Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
    Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a syndrome with heterogeneous causes and mechanisms. An early warning system (EWS) for AKI was created to reduce the incidence and improve outcomes. However, the benefits of AKI-EWS remain debatable. Methods: We launched a project to design and create AKI-EWS for inpatients in our institute. Incidence of AKI and its outcome before and after the implementation of AKI-EWS were collected for analysis. Results: We enlisted a stakeholder map before creating AKI-EWS. We then started an action plan for this initiative. The diagnosis was automatic and based on the definition of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). The differential diagnosis of causes of AKI was also automatic. Users are to adjust the threshold of detection. After the implementation of this AKI-EWS, the incidence of AKI fell. The proportion of AKI > 4% was reduced significantly (47.7% and 41.6%, p = 0.010) in patients with serum creatinine measured. The proportion of AKI > 0.9% also dropped significantly (51.67% and 35.94%, p = 0.024) in all inpatients. Trends of AKI outcomes also showed improvement. The loading of consultation of nephrologists decreased by 15.5%. Conclusions: Through well-designed AKI-EWS, the incidence of AKI dropped, showing improved outcomes. The factors affecting benefits from AKI-EWS included high-risk identification (individual threshold detection), timely and automatic diagnosis, real-time alerting on electronic health information systems, fast self-diagnosing of the cause of AKI, and coverage of all inpatients.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming-Ju Wu & Shih-Che Huang & Cheng-Hsu Chen & Ching-Yao Cheng & Shang-Feng Tsai, 2022. "An Early Warning System for the Differential Diagnosis of In-Hospital Acute Kidney Injury for Better Patient Outcome: Study of a Quality Improvement Initiative," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3704-:d:775501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3704-:d:775501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.