IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3581-d773683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Milagros Adobes Martin

    (Department of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Erica Lipani

    (Department of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Laura Bernes Martinez

    (Department of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo

    (Department of Oral Surgery, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Riccardo Aiuto

    (Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Science, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Daniele Garcovich

    (Department of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of tooth width measurements and Bolton Indices delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 software (Align Technology, San José, CA, USA). Fifty-four plaster casts were selected and measured with a manual calliper by a trained and calibrated observer. The data gathered were compared with those delivered by the software on the corresponding fifty-four virtual casts. The method reliability of the software was assessed by comparing the measurements performed by the software on 201 pairs of clin-checks corresponding to two consecutive treatment phases. Accuracy and reliability were statistically assessed using a mixed model. The software tends to provide larger widths compared with the manual method. Statistically significant differences were found in 23 teeth. At a global level, the mean difference between the methods was −0.19 mm, with a Dahlberg error of 0.24 mm and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. The Bolton Indices delivered by the two methods had a moderate correlation (ICC = 0.59; 0.69). The within method reliability of the software was extremely high. Tooth width measurements delivered by the software, despite the positive bias, can be considered accurate and clinically acceptable for all teeth except molars. The Bolton Indices made available by the software are not accurate and clinically acceptable, especially in the case of mandibular excess.

Suggested Citation

  • Milagros Adobes Martin & Erica Lipani & Laura Bernes Martinez & Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo & Riccardo Aiuto & Daniele Garcovich, 2022. "Reliability of Tooth Width Measurements Delivered by the Clin-Check Pro 6.0 Software on Digital Casts: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3581-:d:773683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3581/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3581/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3581-:d:773683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.