IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3562-d773196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Utility of Length of Mining Service and Latency in Predicting Silicosis among Claimants to a Compensation Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Haidee Williams

    (Division of Occupational Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Rodney Ehrlich

    (Division of Occupational Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Stephen Barker

    (School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada)

  • Sophia Kisting-Cairncross

    (Division of Occupational Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Muzimkhulu Zungu

    (School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
    National Institute for Occupational Health, Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa)

  • Annalee Yassi

    (School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada)

Abstract

In the wake of a large burden of silicosis and tuberculosis among ex-miners from the South African gold mining industry, several programmes have been engaged in examining and compensating those at risk of these diseases. Availability of a database from one such programme, the Q(h)ubeka Trust, provided an opportunity to examine the accuracy of length of service in predicting compensable silicosis, and the concordance between self-reported employment and that officially recorded. Compensable silicosis was determined by expert panels, with ILO profusion ≥1/0 as the threshold for compensability. Age, officially recorded and self-reported years of service, and years since first and last service of 3146 claimants for compensable silicosis were analysed. Self-reported and recorded service were moderately correlated (R = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.68), with a Bland–Altman plot showing no systematic bias. There was reasonably high agreement with 75% of the differences being less than two years. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to test prediction of compensable silicosis. There was little predictive difference between length of service on its own and a model adjusting for length of service, age, and years since last exposure. Predictive accuracy was moderate, with significant potential misclassification. Twenty percent of claimants with compensable silicosis had a length of service <10 years; in almost all these claims, the interval between last exposure and the claim was 10 years or more. In conclusion, self-reported service length in the absence of an official service record could be accepted in claims with compatible clinical findings. Length of service offers, at best, moderate predictive capability for silicosis. Relatively short service compensable silicosis, when combined with at least 10 years since last exposure, was not uncommon.

Suggested Citation

  • Haidee Williams & Rodney Ehrlich & Stephen Barker & Sophia Kisting-Cairncross & Muzimkhulu Zungu & Annalee Yassi, 2022. "The Utility of Length of Mining Service and Latency in Predicting Silicosis among Claimants to a Compensation Trust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3562-:d:773196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3562-:d:773196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.