IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3557-d773089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences between Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Results in Triathletes and Their Association with Body Composition and Body Mass Index

Author

Listed:
  • Szymon Price

    (3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Szczepan Wiecha

    (Department of Physical Education and Health in Biala Podlaska, Faculty in Biala Podlaska, Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, 21-500 Biala Podlaska, Poland)

  • Igor Cieśliński

    (Department of Physical Education and Health in Biala Podlaska, Faculty in Biala Podlaska, Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, 21-500 Biala Podlaska, Poland)

  • Daniel Śliż

    (3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
    Public Health School Centrum Medyczne Kształcenia Podyplomowego (CMKP), 01-813 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Przemysław Seweryn Kasiak

    (Students’ Scientific Group of Lifestyle Medicine, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jacek Lach

    (3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Gruba

    (Students’ Scientific Group of Lifestyle Medicine, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Kowalski

    (Institute of Sport-National Research Institute, 01-982 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Artur Mamcarz

    (3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the method of choice to assess aerobic fitness. Previous research was ambiguous as to whether treadmill (TE) and cycle ergometry (CE) results are transferrable or different between testing modalities in triathletes. The aim of this paper was to investigate the differences in HR and VO 2 at maximum exertion between TE and CE, at anaerobic threshold (AT) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) and evaluate their association with body fat (BF), fat-free mass (FFM) and body mass index (BMI). In total, 143 adult ( n = 18 female), Caucasian triathletes had both Tr and CE CPET performed. The male group was divided into <40 years ( n = 80) and >40 years ( n = 45). Females were aged between 18 and 46 years. Body composition was measured with bioelectrical impedance before tests. Differences were evaluated using paired t -tests, and associations were evaluated in males using multiple linear regression (MLR). Significant differences were found in VO 2 and HR at maximum exertion, at AT and at RCP between CE and TE testing, in both males and females. VO 2AT was 38.8 (±4.6) mL/kg/min in TE vs. 32.8 (±5.4) in CE in males and 36.0 (±3.6) vs. 32.1 (±3.8) in females ( p < 0.001). HR AT was 149 (±10) bpm in TE vs. 136 (±11) in CE in males and 156 (±7) vs. 146 (±11) in females ( p < 0.001). VO 2 max was 52 (±6) mL/kg/min vs. 49 (±7) in CE in males and 45.3 (±4.9) in Tr vs. 43.9 (±5.2) in females ( p < 0.001). HRmax was 183 (±10) bpm in TE vs. 177 (±10) in CE in males and 183 (±9) vs. 179 (±10) in females ( p < 0.001). MLR showed that BMI, BF and FFM are significantly associated with differences in HR and VO 2 at maximum, AT and RCP in males aged >40. Both tests should be used independently to achieve optimal fitness assessments and further training planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Szymon Price & Szczepan Wiecha & Igor Cieśliński & Daniel Śliż & Przemysław Seweryn Kasiak & Jacek Lach & Grzegorz Gruba & Tomasz Kowalski & Artur Mamcarz, 2022. "Differences between Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Results in Triathletes and Their Association with Body Composition and Body Mass Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3557-:d:773089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3557-:d:773089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.