IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3444-d771232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Teledentistry Replace Conventional Clinical Follow-Up Care for Minor Dental Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Heimes

    (Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Philipp Luhrenberg

    (Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nils Langguth

    (Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany)

  • Sebahat Kaya

    (Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany)

  • Christine Obst

    (Private Practice, In den Weingärten 4, 67551 Worms, Germany)

  • Peer W. Kämmerer

    (Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany)

Abstract

(1) Background: Born out of necessity, the implementation of digital processes experienced significant increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, telemedicine offered a bridge to care and now an opportunity to reinvent virtual and hybrid care models, with the goal of improved healthcare access, outcomes, and affordability. The aim of this monocentric prospective, randomized trial was to compare conventional to telephone follow-up after minor dentoalveolar surgery on the basis of special aftercare questionnaires. (2) Methods: Sixty patients who underwent dentoalveolar surgery under local anesthesia were randomly assigned to both groups. After an average of four days, either telephone follow-up (test) or conventional personal aftercare (control) was performed. Based on the questionnaire, the following subject areas were evaluated: symptoms, complications, satisfaction with practitioner, travel, and waiting time, as well as the preferred form of follow-up care. (3) Results: There was no statistically significant difference regarding frequency of symptoms or complication rate. Patients who were assigned to the test group showed a clear tendency to prefer telephone follow-up (83.3%) to conventional aftercare (16.7%, p = 0.047). (4) Conclusions: The data suggest high acceptance of telephone-only follow-up after dentoalveolar surgery. The implementation of telemedicine could be a time- and money-saving alternative for both patients and healthcare professionals and provide healthcare access regardless of time and space.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Heimes & Philipp Luhrenberg & Nils Langguth & Sebahat Kaya & Christine Obst & Peer W. Kämmerer, 2022. "Can Teledentistry Replace Conventional Clinical Follow-Up Care for Minor Dental Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3444-:d:771232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3444-:d:771232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.