IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3388-d770342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group

Author

Listed:
  • Cristiano Spada

    (Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy
    Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Anastasios Koulaouzidis

    (Department of Medicine, OUH Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
    Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), 5000 Odense, Denmark
    Surgical Research Unit, OUH, 5000 Odense, Denmark
    Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Cesare Hassan

    (Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, 20089 Milan, Italy)

  • Pedro Amaro

    (Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Anurag Agrawal

    (Gastroenterology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster DN2 5LT, UK)

  • Lene Brink

    (Gastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University, 2730 Herlev, Denmark)

  • Wolfgang Fischbach

    (Gastroenterologie und Innere Medizin, 63739 Aschaffenburg, Germany)

  • Matthias Hünger

    (Independent Researcher for Internal Medicine, 97070 Würzburg, Germany)

  • Rodrigo Jover

    (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria ISABIAL—Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, 03010 Alicante, Spain)

  • Urpo Kinnunen

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Tampere University Hospital, 33521 Tampere, Finland)

  • Akiko Ono

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain)

  • Árpád Patai

    (Department of Gastroenterology and Medicine, Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital, 9700 Szombathely, Hungary)

  • Silvia Pecere

    (Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
    Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Lucio Petruzziello

    (Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
    Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Jürgen Ferdinand Riemann

    (Department of Medicine C, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
    LebensBlicke Foundation, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany)

  • Harry Staines

    (Sigma Statistical Services Ltd., Saint Andrews KY16 0BD, UK)

  • Ann L. Stringer

    (ECQI Secretariat, Buckinghamshire HP17 8ET, UK)

  • Ervin Toth

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden)

  • Giulio Antonelli

    (Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
    Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, 00040 Rome, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Fuccio

    (Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy)

  • on behalf of the ECQI Group

    (ECQI Group are listed in acknowledgments.)

Abstract

Background: The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group aims to raise awareness for improvement in colonoscopy standards across Europe. We analysed data collected on a sample of procedures conducted across Europe to evaluate the achievement of the polyp detection rate (PDR) target. We also investigated factors associated with PDR, in the hope of establishing areas that could lead to a quality improvement. Methods: 6445 form completions from 12 countries between 2 June 2016 and 30 April 2018 were considered for this analysis. We performed an exploratory analysis looking at PDR according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) definition. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the most influential associated factors after adjusting for the other pre-specified variables. Results: In our sample there were 3365 screening and diagnostic procedures performed in those over 50 years. The PDR was 40.5%, which is comparable with the ESGE minimum standard of 40%. The variables found to be associated with PDR were in descending order: use of high-definition equipment, body mass index (BMI), patient gender, age group, and the reason for the procedure. Use of HD equipment was associated with a significant increase in the reporting of flat lesions (14.3% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and protruded lesions (34.7% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: On average, the sample of European practice captured by the ECQI survey meets the minimum PDR standard set by the ESGE. Our findings support the ESGE recommendation for routine use of HD colonoscopy.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristiano Spada & Anastasios Koulaouzidis & Cesare Hassan & Pedro Amaro & Anurag Agrawal & Lene Brink & Wolfgang Fischbach & Matthias Hünger & Rodrigo Jover & Urpo Kinnunen & Akiko Ono & Árpád Patai &, 2022. "Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3388-:d:770342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3388-:d:770342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.