IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3347-d769575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protecting Breastfeeding during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Perinatal Care Recommendations in the Context of Maternal and Child Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Wesołowska

    (Laboratory of Human Milk and Lactation Research at Regional Human Milk Bank in Holy Family Hospital, Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw, Litewska 14/16, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland
    Human Milk Bank Foundation, Podkowy Str. 128 J, 04-937 Warsaw, Poland
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Magdalena Orczyk-Pawiłowicz

    (Department of Biochemistry and Immunochemistry, Division of Chemistry and Immunochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 48/50, 50-369 Wrocław, Poland
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura

    (Laboratory of Human Milk and Lactation Research at Regional Human Milk Bank in Holy Family Hospital, Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw, Litewska 14/16, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Gawrońska

    (Human Milk Bank Foundation, Podkowy Str. 128 J, 04-937 Warsaw, Poland
    Faculty of Sociology, University of Warsaw, Karowa 18, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Bartłomiej Walczak

    (Institute of Applied Social Sciences, University of Warsaw, Nowy Świat 69, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The objective of this scoping review is to determine to what extent the recommendations on perinatal care protect breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic. The review follows the PRISMA ScR Extension guidelines. The research was conducted in Scopus, Medline via Pubmed, and Web of Science databases from 1 March 2020 to 31 May 2021, using 392 combinations of keywords. We searched for reviews and original papers published in English providing recommendations on delivery mode, companion during labor, the possibility of skin-to-skin contact (SSC), breastfeeding, and visitors policy. After screening, 86 out of 8416 publications qualified for data extraction. The majority of them indicated that COVID-19 infection is not a sufficient reason for a cesarean section; however, on a national level, cesarean births in severely ill patients were overrepresented. A significant number of recommendations deprived mothers of the necessary support during their labor and stay in the maternity ward. A shared decision-making model was hardly visible. Only the earliest COVID-19 recommendations suspended direct breastfeeding; in later publications, decisions were related to the mother’s health, but other options of natural feeding were rarely discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Wesołowska & Magdalena Orczyk-Pawiłowicz & Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura & Małgorzata Gawrońska & Bartłomiej Walczak, 2022. "Protecting Breastfeeding during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Perinatal Care Recommendations in the Context of Maternal and Child Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3347-:d:769575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Benski & Daria Di Filippo & Gianmarco Taraschi & Michael R. Reich, 2020. "Guidelines for Pregnancy Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Public Health Conundrum," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulina Malarkiewicz & Stanisław Maksymowicz & Maria Libura, 2022. "Mother’s Loneliness: Involuntary Separation of Pregnant Women in Maternity Care Settings and Its Effects on the Experience of Mothers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Isadora Celine Rodrigues Carneiro & Sofia Galvão Feronato & Guilherme Ferreira Silveira & Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho & Hellen Geremias dos Santos, 2022. "Clusters of Pregnant Women with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Due to COVID-19: An Unsupervised Learning Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Hyun-Bin Kim & Ah-Hyun Hyun, 2022. "Psychological and Biochemical Effects of an Online Pilates Intervention in Pregnant Women during COVID-19: A Randomized Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3347-:d:769575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.