IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3179-d766631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Primary School Educators’ Perspectives and Experiences of Nature-Based Play and Learning and Its Benefits, Barriers, and Enablers: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole C. Miller

    (Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, 108 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia)

  • Saravana Kumar

    (Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, 108 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia)

  • Karma L. Pearce

    (Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, 108 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia)

  • Katherine L. Baldock

    (Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, 108 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia)

Abstract

Nature-based play and learning is of increasing interest to primary schools and research suggests that it has many potential benefits for children’s health and development. However, little is known about educators’ perspectives and experiences of nature-based play and learning, particularly the barriers, benefits and enablers, despite their direct relevance to the uptake of nature-based play and learning in schools. A qualitative descriptive methodology was employed to uncover these. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 principals and educators from South Australian public primary schools, recruited via a participant contact list from a previous study. The participants were two principals, eight educators and two individuals with dual principal and educator positions. Metropolitan and rural schools were equally represented. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Analysis identified four overarching themes: the practice, perceived benefits, barriers and enablers of nature-based play and learning. Children’s learning, enjoyment, creativity, and a relaxed and flexible environment were clear benefits. Meanwhile educator knowledge and confidence and the crowded curriculum were barriers. Enablers were nature-based play and learning champions and support from school leadership. The findings suggest that schools can help engage students with nature-based play and learning activities by mitigating these barriers and promoting these enablers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole C. Miller & Saravana Kumar & Karma L. Pearce & Katherine L. Baldock, 2022. "Primary School Educators’ Perspectives and Experiences of Nature-Based Play and Learning and Its Benefits, Barriers, and Enablers: A Qualitative Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3179-:d:766631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3179/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3179/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Becker & Gabriele Lauterbach & Sarah Spengler & Ulrich Dettweiler & Filip Mess, 2017. "Effects of Regular Classes in Outdoor Education Settings: A Systematic Review on Students’ Learning, Social and Health Dimensions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew H. E. M. Browning & Alessandro Rigolon, 2019. "School Green Space and Its Impact on Academic Performance: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Ali Moazami-Goodarzi & Maryam Zarra-Nezhad & Maija Hytti & Nina Heiskanen & Nina Sajaniemi, 2021. "Training Early Childhood Teachers to Support Children’s Social and Emotional Learning: A Preliminary Evaluation of Roundies Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Luca Petrigna & Ewan Thomas & Antonino Scardina & Federica Rizzo & Jessica Brusa & Giovanni Camarazza & Claudia Galassi & Antonio Palma & Marianna Bellafiore, 2022. "Methodological Considerations for Movement Education Interventions in Natural Environments for Primary School Children: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Chunxiao Li & Yuxin Zhu & Mengge Zhang & Henrik Gustafsson & Tao Chen, 2019. "Mindfulness and Athlete Burnout: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Jeff Mann & Tonia Gray & Son Truong & Pasi Sahlberg & Peter Bentsen & Rowena Passy & Susanna Ho & Kumara Ward & Rachel Cowper, 2021. "A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Efficacy of Nature-Based Learning in Outdoor Educational Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Hua Wu & Wichai Eungpinichpong & Hui Ruan & Wenke Chen & Yibei Yang & Xiujuan Dong, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Early Education Practices: A Quasi-Experimental Study on the Effects of Kindergarten Physical Education Programs on Fundamental Movement Skills and Self-Regulation in Haikou City, ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Sarah Clement & Katie Spellman & Laura Oxtoby & Kelly Kealy & Karin Bodony & Elena Sparrow & Christopher Arp, 2023. "Redistributing Power in Community and Citizen Science: Effects on Youth Science Self-Efficacy and Interest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Lucia Mason & Lucia Manzione & Angelica Ronconi & Francesca Pazzaglia, 2022. "Lessons in a Green School Environment and in the Classroom: Effects on Students’ Cognitive Functioning and Affect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Katja Oomen-Welke & Evelyn Schlachter & Tina Hilbich & Johannes Naumann & Alexander Müller & Thilo Hinterberger & Roman Huber, 2022. "Spending Time in the Forest or the Field: Investigations on Stress Perception and Psychological Well-Being—A Randomized Cross-Over Trial in Highly Sensitive Persons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3179-:d:766631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.