IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2943-d763000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Guided Written Disclosure Reduce Distress and Improve Psychological Functioning in Patients with Skin Diseases?

Author

Listed:
  • Rossella Mattea Quinto

    (Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy)

  • Luca Iani

    (Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesco De Vincenzo

    (Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesca Russo

    (Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy)

  • Piero Porcelli

    (Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University of “G. D’Annunzio” Chieti–Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Damiano Abeni

    (Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata, IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background. Skin diseases (e.g., psoriasis and systemic sclerosis) are generally associated with negative psychosocial outcomes. Although different psychological interventions have been used to improve the quality of life of dermatological patients, the effects of the guided written disclosure (GWD) protocol have not been previously examined in these patients. Moreover, little attention has been paid to positive psychology constructs. Methods. This study investigates the effectiveness of GWD on positive and negative functioning in dermatological patients. Pre- and 1-month post-intervention measures included emotion regulation, sense of inner peace, skin-related symptoms and functioning, sense of coherence, and psychological distress. Results. A total of 196 consecutive outpatients were randomly assigned to GWD and active control groups, of whom 60 (30.6%) completed the study and 45 (GWD: n = 24; AC: n = 21) provided complete data. Our results did not show any significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the outcome variables, whereas non-completers reported higher levels of distress, unpleasant skin-related emotions, and lower cognitive reappraisal compared to completers. Conclusions. These findings show a poor compliance, and suggest that expressive writing is not well accepted by patients and is not effective in improving positive and negative psychological functioning in dermatological patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossella Mattea Quinto & Luca Iani & Francesco De Vincenzo & Francesca Russo & Piero Porcelli & Damiano Abeni, 2022. "Does Guided Written Disclosure Reduce Distress and Improve Psychological Functioning in Patients with Skin Diseases?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2943-:d:763000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2943/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2943/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2943-:d:763000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.