IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2796-d760211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occurrence of No-Harm Incidents and Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients with Ischemic Stroke or TIA: A Cohort Study Using Trigger Tool Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Bartosch Nowak

    (Department Head Organs, Spine- and Neuromedicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

  • René Schwendimann

    (Patient Safety Office, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
    Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Philippe Lyrer

    (Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Leo H. Bonati

    (Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Gian Marco De Marchis

    (Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Nils Peters

    (Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Franziska Zúñiga

    (Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Lili Saar

    (Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany)

  • Maria Unbeck

    (School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, 79131 Falun, Sweden
    Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Michael Simon

    (Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland)

Abstract

Adverse events (AEs)—healthcare caused events leading to patient harm or even death—are common in healthcare. Although it is a frequently investigated topic, systematic knowledge on this phenomenon in stroke patients is limited. To determine cumulative incidence of no-harm incidents and AEs, including their severity and preventability, a cohort study using trigger tool methodology for retrospective record review was designed. The study was carried out in a stroke center at a university hospital in the German speaking part of Switzerland. Electronic records from 150 randomly selected patient admissions for transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke, with or without acute recanalization therapy, were used. In total, 170 events (108 AEs and 62 no-harm incidents) were identified, affecting 83 patients (55.3%; 95% CI 47 to 63.4), corresponding to an event rate of 113 events/100 admissions or 142 events/1000 patient days. The three most frequent AEs were ischemic strokes ( n = 12, 7.1%), urinary tract infections ( n = 11, 6.5%) and phlebitis ( n = 10, 5.9%). The most frequent no-harm incidents were medication events ( n = 37, 21.8%). Preventability ranged from 12.5% for allergic reactions to 100% for medication events and pressure ulcers. Most of the events found (142; 83.5%; 95% CI 76.9 to 88.6) occurred throughout the whole stroke care. The remaining 28 events (16.5%; 95% CI 11.4 to 23.1) were detected during stroke care but were related to care outside the stroke pathway. Trigger tool methodology allows detection of AEs and no-harm incidents, showing a frequent occurrence of both event types in stroke and TIA patients. Further investigations into events’ relationships with organizational systems and processes will be needed, first to achieve a better understanding of these events’ underlying mechanisms and risk factors, then to determine efforts needed to improve patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartosch Nowak & René Schwendimann & Philippe Lyrer & Leo H. Bonati & Gian Marco De Marchis & Nils Peters & Franziska Zúñiga & Lili Saar & Maria Unbeck & Michael Simon, 2022. "Occurrence of No-Harm Incidents and Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients with Ischemic Stroke or TIA: A Cohort Study Using Trigger Tool Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2796-:d:760211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2796-:d:760211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.