IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2636-d757585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Three-Step Procedure for Emergency Cerclage: Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Gómez-Castellano

    (Obstetrics and Gynecology, Materno-Infantil Hospital Regional Universitary Málaga, Avd Arroyo de los Angeles S/N, 29011 Malaga, Spain)

  • Lorena Sabonet-Morente

    (Obstetrics and Gynecology, Materno-Infantil Hospital Regional Universitary Málaga, Avd Arroyo de los Angeles S/N, 29011 Malaga, Spain)

  • Ernesto González-Mesa

    (Obstetrics and Gynecology, Materno-Infantil Hospital Regional Universitary Málaga, Avd Arroyo de los Angeles S/N, 29011 Malaga, Spain
    Biochemistry and Immunology Department, Malaga Biomedical Research Institute—IBIMA, University of Málaga, Surgical Specialties, 29010 Malaga, Spain)

  • Jesús S. Jiménez-López

    (Obstetrics and Gynecology, Materno-Infantil Hospital Regional Universitary Málaga, Avd Arroyo de los Angeles S/N, 29011 Malaga, Spain
    Biochemistry and Immunology Department, Malaga Biomedical Research Institute—IBIMA, University of Málaga, Surgical Specialties, 29010 Malaga, Spain)

Abstract

(1) Background: The objective of our prospective observational study was to evaluate a new technique for emergency cerclage, which was performed on a cohort of patients with cervical incompetence in the second trimester. (2) Methods: 26 pregnant women presented at 15 to 24 weeks of gestation with cervical dilatation and bursa prolapse. A new emergency cerclage was performed using a technique consisting of the first cerclage in a tobacco bag and a second occlusive cerclage located inferiorly to the first. The technique is concluded with the performance of a cervical cleisis when vaginal bag prolapse is present, and this overall procedure is called the three-step procedure for emergency cerclage (TSEC). (3) Results: To assess its effectiveness, we measured the latency from procedure to delivery, pregnancy duration, infant birth weight, and rate of premature amniorrhexis. The mean latency from procedure to delivery was 14 weeks + 6 days, the mean weight of newborns was 2550 g and the mean gestational age at delivery was 35 weeks. The neonatal survival rate was 95.8%. The rate of premature amniorrhexis (<34 weeks gestational age) was 8.3% (two cases) with successful perinatal outcomes. There were significant differences ( p < 0.05) between groups. A multivariate regression model showed that the best variables for predicting the latency to delivery were the cervical dilatation at diagnosis, use of the three-step cerclage, cervical length after the procedure, and gestational age at diagnosis. (4) Conclusions: The excellent results obtained with the TSEC procedure in terms of the latency from the procedure to delivery, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and having few reported complications highlight the importance of collecting new data on this promising novel procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Gómez-Castellano & Lorena Sabonet-Morente & Ernesto González-Mesa & Jesús S. Jiménez-López, 2022. "A Three-Step Procedure for Emergency Cerclage: Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2636-:d:757585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2636-:d:757585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.