IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2584-d756653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire of the Perioperative Nursing Competencies in Patient Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Ester Peñataro-Pintado

    (Nursing Department, University School of Nursing and Occupational Therapy of Terrassa (EUIT), 08221 Terrassa, Spain
    Nursing Department, Campus Sant Cugat, International University of Catalonia (UIC), 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain)

  • Encarna Rodríguez-Higueras

    (Nursing Department, Campus Sant Cugat, International University of Catalonia (UIC), 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain)

  • Mireia Llauradó-Serra

    (Nursing Department, Campus Sant Cugat, International University of Catalonia (UIC), 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain)

  • Noelia Gómez-Delgado

    (Nursing Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Rafael Llorens-Ortega

    (Nursing Department, University School of Nursing and Occupational Therapy of Terrassa (EUIT), 08221 Terrassa, Spain)

  • José Luis Díaz-Agea

    (Nursing Department, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Guadalupe de Maciascoque, Spain)

Abstract

(1) Background: This research presents the CUCEQS© (Spanish acronym for Questionnaire of Perioperative Nursing Safety Competencies), which evaluates the perception of perioperative nurses about their competencies related to surgical patient safety. The aim of the present study was to design, validate, and analyze the psychometric properties of the CUCEQS©. (2) Methods: We devised an instrumental, quantitative, and descriptive study divided into two phases: in the first, the questionnaire was designed through a Delphi method developed by perioperative nurses and experts in patient safety. In the second, the reliability, validity, and internal structure of the tool were evaluated. (3) Results: In the first phase, the items kept were those that obtained a mean equal to or higher than four out of five in the expert consensus, and a Content Validity Index higher than 0.78. In the second phase, at the global level, a Stratified Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.992 was obtained, and for each competency, Cronbach’s Alpha values between 0.81 and 0.97 were found. A first-order confirmatory factor analysis of the 17 subscales (RMSEA 0.028, (IC 90% = 0.026–0.029) and its observed measures was performed for the 164 items, as well as a second-order analysis of the four competencies (RMSEA = 0.034, (IC90% = 0.033–0.035). (4) Conclusions: The questionnaire is a valid tool for measuring the perceived level of competency by the perioperative nurses in surgical patient safety. This is the first questionnaire developed for this purpose, and the results obtained will facilitate the identification of areas to be improved by health professionals in patient safety

Suggested Citation

  • Ester Peñataro-Pintado & Encarna Rodríguez-Higueras & Mireia Llauradó-Serra & Noelia Gómez-Delgado & Rafael Llorens-Ortega & José Luis Díaz-Agea, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Questionnaire of the Perioperative Nursing Competencies in Patient Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2584-:d:756653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2584/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2584/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2584-:d:756653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.