IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2270-d751394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in Overall and Menthol Market Shares of Leading Cigarette Brands in the USA: 2014–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Erin J. Miller Lo

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • William J. Young

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Ollie Ganz

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Eugene M. Talbot

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Richard J. O’Connor

    (Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA)

  • Cristine D. Delnevo

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

Abstract

Many factors can shift cigarette brand preference, and surveillance is an important tactic to inform regulatory strategy. The objective of this study was to identify shifts in top brands’ overall and menthol market share from 2014 to 2019. We used data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health public use datasets, which are a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of people aged 12+ in the USA. In our analysis of top brands, we accounted for consumption patterns and computed the percent change in market share for each brand. We observed that overall market share declined for nearly all brands, though top moderately priced brands gained share. Half of the top brands with menthol styles grew in menthol market share. We observed three primary shifts in the cigarette market: brands that gained the most menthol market share were brands with both menthol and non-menthol in their product lineups; menthol contributed substantially to discount brands’ market share increases; the two premium brands that employed “natural” descriptors experienced increased market share. Research should continue to focus on trends that influence cigarette market share, as the cigarette market in the USA is likely to look very different in five years than it does today.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin J. Miller Lo & William J. Young & Ollie Ganz & Eugene M. Talbot & Richard J. O’Connor & Cristine D. Delnevo, 2022. "Trends in Overall and Menthol Market Shares of Leading Cigarette Brands in the USA: 2014–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2270-:d:751394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2270/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2270/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ce Shang & James Nonnemaker & Kymberle Sterling & Jessica Sobolewski & Scott R. Weaver, 2021. "Impact of Little Cigars and Cigarillos Packaging Features on Product Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    2. repec:cdl:ctcres:qt5tp828kn is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael S. Dunbar & Joan S. Tucker, 2022. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Emerging Trends in Combustible Tobacco and Vaping Product Use”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-4, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin-Hee Park & Mi-Jin Kim & Sung-Eun Kim, 2022. "Factors Influencing Smoking among Multicultural Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-8, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2270-:d:751394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.