IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2180-d749735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintaining Clinical Training Continuity during COVID-19 Pandemic: Nursing Students’ Perceptions about Simulation-Based Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sitah Alshutwi

    (College of Nursing, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia
    King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh 14611, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fatmah Alsharif

    (Medical Surgical Nursing Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Faygah Shibily

    (Critical Care Nursing Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Almutairi Wedad M.

    (Maternity and Pediatric Nursing Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Monir M. Almotairy

    (Nursing Administration and Education Department, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia)

  • Maram Algabbashi

    (Nursing Sciences and Research Department, College of Nursing, Umm Alqura University, Makkah 24232, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based learning (SBL) in nursing education is an innovative pedagogical approach that has significantly improved nursing education. Adopting SBL provides a controlled environment for meeting educational objectives without the risk of harm to real patients. Given that social distancing is required during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, SBL is a suitable alternative to clinical training for nursing students to learn and acquire the required clinical competencies. The study aimed to describe the effectiveness of SBL as a complete substitute for clinical experience from the perspective of students. This cross-sectional descriptive survey investigated students’ perceptions regarding the description of the effectiveness of SBL in four nursing colleges at four different universities across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Settings: Four nursing colleges at four different universities across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Participants included nursing students who attended simulation sessions. Data were collected by distributing a self-administrated online questionnaire, the Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET-M), which is a 19-item. Results: Approximately two-thirds of the participants were in their third (30.4%) and fourth (44.5%) academic year. The highest student presentation was for Site 1 (39.5%) and Site 2 (32.5%). Significant differences existed in all domains according to sex and university ( p ≤ 0.001). There was a significant difference in relation to the level of agreement for pre-briefing, scenario, and debriefing domains (<0.001). Conclusions: SBL is a valuable teaching strategy that enhances nursing students’ self-awareness, self-confidence, clinical performance, and efficiency in performing procedures with considerable gender variation. Female students had more positive perceptions toward simulation effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Sitah Alshutwi & Fatmah Alsharif & Faygah Shibily & Almutairi Wedad M. & Monir M. Almotairy & Maram Algabbashi, 2022. "Maintaining Clinical Training Continuity during COVID-19 Pandemic: Nursing Students’ Perceptions about Simulation-Based Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2180-:d:749735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thor Arne Haukedal & Inger Åse Reierson & Hanne Hedeman & Ida Torunn Bjørk, 2018. "The Impact of a New Pedagogical Intervention on Nursing Students’ Knowledge Acquisition in Simulation-Based Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2180-:d:749735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.