IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1880-d744202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence in Bone Metastases: An MRI and CT Imaging Review

Author

Listed:
  • Eliodoro Faiella

    (Department of Radiology, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

  • Domiziana Santucci

    (Department of Radiology, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

  • Alessandro Calabrese

    (Department of Radiology, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Viale del Policlinico, 00161 Roma, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Russo

    (Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

  • Gianluca Vadalà

    (Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

  • Bruno Beomonte Zobel

    (Department of Radiology, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

  • Paolo Soda

    (Unit of Computer Systems and Bioinformatics, Department of Engineering, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

  • Giulio Iannello

    (Unit of Computer Systems and Bioinformatics, Department of Engineering, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

  • Carlo de Felice

    (Department of Radiology, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Viale del Policlinico, 00161 Roma, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Denaro

    (Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Rome “Campus Bio-Medico”, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

(1) Background: The purpose of this review is to study the role of radiomics as a supporting tool in predicting bone disease status, differentiating benign from malignant bone lesions, and characterizing malignant bone lesions. (2) Methods: Two reviewers conducted the literature search independently. Thirteen articles on radiomics as a decision support tool for bone lesions were selected. The quality of the methodology was evaluated according to the radiomics quality score (RQS). (3) Results: All studies were published between 2018 and 2021 and were retrospective in design. Eleven (85%) studies were MRI-based, and two (15%) were CT-based. The sample size was <200 patients for all studies. There is significant heterogeneity in the literature, as evidenced by the relatively low RQS value (average score = 22.6%). There is not a homogeneous protocol used for MRI sequences among the different studies, although the highest predictive ability was always obtained in T2W-FS. Six articles (46%) reported on the potential application of the model in a clinical setting with a decision curve analysis (DCA). (4) Conclusions: Despite the variability in the radiomics method application, the similarity of results and conclusions observed is encouraging. Substantial limits were found; prospective and multicentric studies are needed to affirm the role of radiomics as a supporting tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliodoro Faiella & Domiziana Santucci & Alessandro Calabrese & Fabrizio Russo & Gianluca Vadalà & Bruno Beomonte Zobel & Paolo Soda & Giulio Iannello & Carlo de Felice & Vincenzo Denaro, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence in Bone Metastases: An MRI and CT Imaging Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1880-:d:744202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1880-:d:744202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.