IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1866-d743872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Feedback Form and Its Role in Improving the Quality of Trauma Care

Author

Listed:
  • Hany Bahouth

    (Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel
    The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Institute of Technology, Haifa 3109601, Israel)

  • Roi Abramov

    (Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel)

  • Moran Bodas

    (The Israeli National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262100, Israel
    Department of Emergency Management and Disaster Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv-Yafo 6997801, Israel)

  • Michael Halberthal

    (The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Institute of Technology, Haifa 3109601, Israel
    Rambam Management, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel)

  • Shaul Lin

    (The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Institute of Technology, Haifa 3109601, Israel
    The Israeli National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262100, Israel
    Department of Endodontics and Dental Trauma, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel)

Abstract

Background : One of the tasks of a level I trauma center is quality improvement of level II and level III regional hospitals and emergency medical services by means of continuous education and learning processes. One of the tools for this, which provides constant monitoring of the quality of treatment, is feedback. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of feedback on the quality of trauma care. Methods : Retrospective cohort study comprising two periods of time, 2012–2013 and 2017–2018. The study group included physicians and pre-hospital staff who treated patients prior to referral to the level I center. Upon arrival when the trauma teams identified issues requiring improvement, they were asked to fill in feedback forms. Data on patients treated in the trauma shock room for whom feedback forms were filled out were also extracted. Results : A total of 662 feedback forms were completed, showing a significant improvement ( p ˂ 0.0001). The majority of the medical personnel who received the most negative feedback were the pre-hospital staff. A significant increase was revealed in the number of feedbacks with reference to mismanagement of backboard spinal fixation, of the pre-hospital staff, in 2012–2013 compared to 2017–2018 ( p < 0.001). Improvement in reducing the time of treatment in the field was also revealed, from 15.2 ± 8.3 min in 2012–2013 to 13.4 ± 7.9 min in 2017–2018. Conclusion : The findings show that feedback improves the treatment of injured patients. Furthermore, constantly monitoring the quality of treatment provided by the trauma team is vital for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Hany Bahouth & Roi Abramov & Moran Bodas & Michael Halberthal & Shaul Lin, 2022. "The Feedback Form and Its Role in Improving the Quality of Trauma Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1866-:d:743872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1866/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1866/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1866-:d:743872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.