IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1834-d743227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Influencing Factors and Workload Variation of Takeover Behavior in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Zhang

    (Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Yijun Zhang

    (Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Yiying Xiao

    (Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Chaozhong Wu

    (Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan 430063, China)

Abstract

There are many factors that will influence the workload of drivers during autonomous driving. To examine the correlation between different factors and the workload of drivers, the influence of different factors on the workload variations is investigated from subjective and objective viewpoints. Thirty-seven drivers were recruited to participant the semi-autonomous driving experiments, and the drivers were required to complete different NDRTs (Non-Driving-Related Tasks): mistake finding, chatting, texting, and monitoring when the vehicle is in autonomous mode. Then, we introduced collision warning to signal there is risk ahead, and the warning signal was triggered at different TB (Time Budget)s before the risk, at which time the driver had to take over the driving task. During driving, the NASA-TLX-scale data were obtained to analyze the variation of the driver’s subjective workload. The driver’s pupil-diameter data acquired by the eye tracker from 100 s before the TOR (Take-Over Request) to 19 s after the takeover were obtained as well. The sliding time window was set to process the pupil-diameter data, and the 119-s normalized average pupil-diameter data under different NDRTs were fitted and modeled to analyze the variation of the driver’s objective workload. The results show that the total subjective workload score under the influence of different factors is as follows: obstacle-avoidance scene > lane-keeping scene; TB = 7 s and TB = 3 s have no significant difference; and mistake finding > chatting > texting > monitoring. The results of pupil-diameter data under different factors are as follows: obstacle-avoidance scene > lane-keeping scene; TB = 7 s > TB = 3 s; and monitoring type (chatting and monitoring) > texting type (mistake finding and texting). The research results can provide a reference for takeover safety prediction modeling based on workload.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Zhang & Yijun Zhang & Yiying Xiao & Chaozhong Wu, 2022. "Analyzing the Influencing Factors and Workload Variation of Takeover Behavior in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1834-:d:743227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1834/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1834/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haorong Peng & Feng Chen & Peiyan Chen, 2022. "Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1834-:d:743227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.